Skip to content

History Lesson: media coverage and the triple crown

May 29, 2009, 10:01 AM EDT

Lar at Wezen-Ball
takes a look back at an article from 1997 that, in turn, takes a look
back at Carl Yastrzemski’s 1967 Triple Crown. This quote from Yaz
floored me:

“. . . being in the pennant race, I was so focused that I didn’t
know I had won it until the next day. There wasn’t any media attention
on the Triple Crown. None whatsoever. It was the first time Boston had
been in a pennant race in a long time, and everything and everyone was
focused on it.'”

Could you imagine what would happen today if a player even entered
mid-August with leads in all three of the triple crown categories? ESPN
would embed reporters in the field, talk radio would go absolutely
crazy, and the Internets would probably explode. I can’t even conceive
of there being minor coverage, let alone none.

Beyond that, Lar has some good analysis regarding the odds of
someone winning the triple crown today. I think he’s right when he
notes that hitters are more specialized today, with teams having a much
greater tolerance for power hitters who strike out a lot, which in
turn, drastically lowers their shot at a batting title, especially with
slap hitter like Freddy Sanchez and Ichiro hanging around. Lar thinks
that, among current players, Mauer and Pujols have the best shot of
winning it. I can’t say I disagree, though I think the window will be
closing on Pujols’s chances fairly quickly.

Anyway, good stuff as always from Wezen-Ball.

Featured video

Who's to blame for Cubs tarp fiasco?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. R. Castillo (3828)
  2. M. Cuddyer (2657)
  3. K. Bryant (2398)
  4. G. Richards (2183)
  5. A. Garcia (2095)
  1. W. Myers (2035)
  2. A. McCutchen (2028)
  3. J. Werth (1989)
  4. H. Ramirez (1892)
  5. Y. Molina (1861)