<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What happened to all the Twins&#039; bunt hits?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/06/29/what-happened-to-all-the-twins-bunt-hits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/06/29/what-happened-to-all-the-twins-bunt-hits/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:35:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short sale in San Diego</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/06/29/what-happened-to-all-the-twins-bunt-hits/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Short sale in San Diego]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=163#comment-315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t  write on blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very  becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault  at all, but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy  just reading the  posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points…I would note that as someone who really doesn’t  write on blogs much (in fact, this may be my first post), I don’t think the term “lurker” is very  becoming to a non-posting reader. It’s not your fault  at all, but perhaps the blogosphere could come up with a better, non-creepy name for the 90% of us that enjoy  just reading the  posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
