Aug 17, 2009, 9:21 AM EDT
Before the game starts it’s the home team — not the umpires — who decide if a game should be delayed due to rain. According to Dejan Kovacevic — one of the best beat writers in the business, by the way — the Cubs screwed up yesterday’s rainout against the Pirates royally:
First, there was a delay because of the threat
of a storm. Then, after about 20 minutes of solid rain, there was
barely a drop for nearly two hours while the Cubs — the home team is
singularly responsible for calling the beginning of any game — waited
for another storm to arrive.
It never did.
By the time the game was called at 4:35 p.m. Central time, skies
were almost fully clear, and many in the capacity crowd shouted and
booed loudly. No more rain would fall the rest of the day.
My old man was a weatherman for the National Weather Service. He always liked to say that he had the greatest job in the world because, hey, where else could you be wrong all the damn time and not get fired? The only possible answer I can give is being the people that run the Cubs.
- Mike Trout hit his 100th career home run to become the youngest member of the 100 HR/100 SB club 7
- Make that two: Alex Rodriguez hits second homer of the night, giving him 658 for his career 24
- Alex Rodriguez hit his 657th career home run 43
- Let’s all just stare at Kris Bryant’s numbers for a while 27
- And That Happened: Thursday’s scores and highlights 39
- The wait is over: The Cubs are calling up top prospect Kris Bryant on Friday 99
- Carlos Gomez headed to disabled list with hamstring injury 11
- The Commissioner’s Office thinks that the Angels could indeed go after Josh Hamilton under his contract 153
- The Commissioner’s Office thinks that the Angels could indeed go after Josh Hamilton under his contract (153)
- “Why Ted Cruz is like the Atlanta Braves” (150)
- “We no longer need the terrorists. We’re now so good at terrorizing ourselves.” (143)
- Another argument in favor of making the DH universal (127)
- When it comes to Josh Hamilton, Arte Moreno is a craven opportunist, not a “smart businessman” (116)