Sep 9, 2009, 4:52 PM EST
Sparked by some nice work from MLB Trade Rumors and MVN’s Lisa Gray, the Astros have revealed that an error was made in recent media guides, giving Jose Valverde a birthdate of June 24, 1979, rather than his actual DOB of March 24, 1978.
This obviously wasn’t just an Astros mistake, as Valverde has been listed as a 1979 birth by many publications dating back to his days as a prospect in the Arizona system. Others have had the correct date. I believe Rotoworld has always gone by the correct date, though I’m struggling to come up with any old examples of us stating Valverde’s age. I did have him listed at age 32, as of Opening Day, 2010, in our free agency preview back in May.
Even if some teams did think he was 15 months younger than he is, it really shouldn’t be much of an issue when he becomes a free agent this winter. Age is far more of an issue when it comes to hitters. Assuming that he finishes the season healthy, Valverde figures to be regarded as the top closer available over alternatives like Rafael Soriano, Fernando Rodney, Billy Wagner and Mike Gonzalez.
- Great Moments in Media Arrogance: Marshawn Lynch edition 137
- Nationals sign former Blue Jays closer Casey Janssen 10
- Ichiro Suzuki’s deal with the Marlins is worth $2 million 31
- Orioles acquire outfielder Travis Snider from Pirates 36
- Not so fast on the Bud Selig Hall of Fame talk 50
- Blue Jays sign president and CEO Paul Beeston to extension through 2015 26
- Reds sign four-year contract extension with Devin Mesoraco 11
- The Yankees are going to try to get out of paying A-Rod his contract incentives 82
- Great Moments in Media Arrogance: Marshawn Lynch edition (148)
- Rob Manfred, new Major League Baseball commissioner, suggests ban on defensive shifts (118)
- Why “Deflategate” would never happen in baseball (94)
- The Yankees are going to try to get out of paying A-Rod his contract incentives (82)
- Comments of the Day: some of you guys aren’t big Bud Selig fans (77)