Comments on: Pujols named Sporting News' Player of the Decade

By: Night Sweat

Night Sweat — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:44:50 +0000

Thank you for your assist!

By: Alex Poterack

Alex Poterack — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:49:17 +0000

You can’t prove a negative, but you don’t have to make a big point of it, either.
Do I think Pujols used steroids? No. Do I *know* he didn’t? No, so I won’t try to use it as a point in his favor. He’s the greatest baseball player in the game today; that’s something I can prove. Whether or not he had chemical help with that is a much messier discussion.

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:31:32 +0000

Of course, where steroids are concerned, there are test results…

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:30:34 +0000

Hey, demanding proof of a negative is the new national pastime. Surpassed baseball about six months ago, I think.

By: GBS

GBS — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:56 +0000

I hate the fact that we’re at a point where someone has to prove a negative.
Not that Jeff’s point isn’t valid – there’s a cloud of suspicion over everyone these days – but, man, it sure does suck.

By: jeff Berardi

jeff Berardi — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:08:46 +0000

“And Albert never used steroids to enhance his ability, A-Rod did.”
I’d like to see you prove that.

By: flyhi

flyhi — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:56:13 +0000

And Albert never used steroids to enhance his ability, A-Rod did.