<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Yankees-Twins game ought to be fun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:58:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don W</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don W]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 12:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[% of Yankees&#039; HR&#039;s @ Yankee Stadium - 55.7%
% of opponent&#039;s HR&#039;s Yankees gave up @ Yankee Stadium - 55.8%
Those dirty Yankees, cheating again by obviously building a stadium that aided them way more than their opponent!  (insert eye roll)
Yes the new Yankee Stadium appears to be homer heaven.  I say appears because one year is far too little data to be sure.  (If you don&#039;t believe me please explain how Angels Stadium goes from a HR park factor of 0.933 in 2008 to a 1.220 in 2009.  New Yankee Stadium was a 1.261 this year.)  However, the idea that the Yankees are somehow cheating and greatly benefiting from the propensity for HR&#039;s is ridiculous.  The numbers are clear, the wall in right-center field helped BOTH teams equally this year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>% of Yankees&#8217; HR&#8217;s @ Yankee Stadium &#8211; 55.7%<br />
% of opponent&#8217;s HR&#8217;s Yankees gave up @ Yankee Stadium &#8211; 55.8%<br />
Those dirty Yankees, cheating again by obviously building a stadium that aided them way more than their opponent!  (insert eye roll)<br />
Yes the new Yankee Stadium appears to be homer heaven.  I say appears because one year is far too little data to be sure.  (If you don&#8217;t believe me please explain how Angels Stadium goes from a HR park factor of 0.933 in 2008 to a 1.220 in 2009.  New Yankee Stadium was a 1.261 this year.)  However, the idea that the Yankees are somehow cheating and greatly benefiting from the propensity for HR&#8217;s is ridiculous.  The numbers are clear, the wall in right-center field helped BOTH teams equally this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcohm McGregor</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcohm McGregor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any wind blowing out of this Yankee Stadium on any day means HR&#039;s. This silly bandbox was designed to give up HR&#039;s and has proven it&#039;s point this year.  Terrible deliberate stadium design by the do anything to win Damn Yankees.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any wind blowing out of this Yankee Stadium on any day means HR&#8217;s. This silly bandbox was designed to give up HR&#8217;s and has proven it&#8217;s point this year.  Terrible deliberate stadium design by the do anything to win Damn Yankees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwar Desires Your Soul</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gwar Desires Your Soul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because there are no other factors in play when determining who will give up a greater number of homeruns....none.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because there are no other factors in play when determining who will give up a greater number of homeruns&#8230;.none.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church of the Perpetually Outraged</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Church of the Perpetually Outraged]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If true, then hopefully this plays out correctly:
Duensing - 5.68 K/9
CC - 7.71 K/9
Less balls in play = less chances for HR]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If true, then hopefully this plays out correctly:<br />
Duensing &#8211; 5.68 K/9<br />
CC &#8211; 7.71 K/9<br />
Less balls in play = less chances for HR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sal</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5004</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig come back tomorrow with the same topic on your column and the results.  I have a gut feeling you are right about this.  I want to see what Alan thinks then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig come back tomorrow with the same topic on your column and the results.  I have a gut feeling you are right about this.  I want to see what Alan thinks then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5003</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig is so irrelevant that he has two well-trafficked and respected blogs.
Sigh. I keep telling myself not to feed the trolls and then here I go again...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig is so irrelevant that he has two well-trafficked and respected blogs.<br />
Sigh. I keep telling myself not to feed the trolls and then here I go again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Yogi</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dr. Yogi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weird, Alan, do you have a habit of reading and commenting about irrelevant writers?  What does that say about you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, Alan, do you have a habit of reading and commenting about irrelevant writers?  What does that say about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calcaterra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Calcaterra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yet here you are reading and commenting. Twice.
Huh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet here you are reading and commenting. Twice.<br />
Huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-5000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-5000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig,
I don&#039;t think anyone cares about your column anymore or what you have to say anymore. Thats what happens when you become irrelevant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,<br />
I don&#8217;t think anyone cares about your column anymore or what you have to say anymore. Thats what happens when you become irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/10/07/the-yankees-twins-came-ought-to-be-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-4999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=1623#comment-4999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Craig,
I don&#039;t think anyone cares about your column anymore or what you have to say anymore. Thats what happens when you become irrelevant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig,<br />
I don&#8217;t think anyone cares about your column anymore or what you have to say anymore. Thats what happens when you become irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
