Skip to content

Diamondbacks get lucky: Reynolds misses arbitration cutoff

Oct 20, 2009, 3:59 PM EDT

As we noted back in July, it was sure to go right down to the wire. As it turned out, Mark Reynolds’ two years and 138 days of service time wasn’t quite enough to make him a “super-two” arbitration eligible player. This year’s cutoff was two years, 141 days.
Under the rules of MLB, players with between three and six years of service time, as well as the top one-sixth of players with between two and three years, qualify for arbitration after every season. Those top one-sixth are known as “super-two” players, and that one rule is why we’ve seen teams so cautious about promoting prospects in April and early May during recent years.
Reynolds was called up from the majors on May 16, 2007, never to be sent down. Had the Diamondbacks chosen to promote him on May 13 instead, he’d likely be in line to earn at least $5 million next year. As is, Arizona could pay him as little as $500,000 or maybe up to $800,000 or so if the team is feeling generous.
Tim Lincecum, on the other hand, was called up on May 6, 2007, never to be sent down. Those extra seven days spent on the roster of a team that ended up finishing in last place will cost the Giants dearly. Lincecum figures to ask for something in the neighborhood of the $10 million Ryan Howard requested and received as a super-two player after 2007. Not only are the Giants going to spend $9 million more than they needed to on Lincecum next year, but that huge increase will continue to be reflected in future arbitration years and keep costing them down the road.
So, yeah, the Giants made a huge mistake. The Diamondbacks, though, weren’t nearly as sure what they had in Reynolds when a Chad Tracy injury led to his callup. They caught a big break in that they won’t have to pay for Reynolds’ ample production for another year. The $5 million that they might have spent on him can now go towards improving the rotation or the bullpen or for an upgrade at second base.

  1. Joey B - Oct 20, 2009 at 4:44 PM

    Bad GMing. Death by 1000 cuts, and this one completely unnecessary. I’m not saying you have to go the cheap route everytime, and sometimes you cannot anticipate how good a player will, so how much it will cost you. But how many places on this planet do you get a chance to commit an avoidable $10M mistake and get away with it.
    Price was 10-7 with a 4.42, so it’s doubtful that he’d have made much, if any, difference. Smart move by TB keeping him for an extra year. Hardy stunk,was easily replaceable, and wasn’t in the Brewer’s future plans. They’ll get back more for him in trade now. Good move. I wouldn’t let it affect a pennant race, nor would I create excessive bad feelings for a player I intended on keeping, but Sabean gave away the $10M+ for no reason.

  2. Travis M. Nelson - Oct 22, 2009 at 11:35 AM

    So, does this count as Reynolds’ 224th strikeout?

  3. custom t shirt printing - Feb 8, 2010 at 10:55 PM

    Hey guys(fantastic blog by the way) I’m “blog hopping” asking different questions about the Super Bowl what was your favorite play last night?

  4. Mallie Lantis - Feb 19, 2010 at 6:34 PM

    Hey there…I’m from the UK. I know your article is focused on the US so here’s a site with a UK focus for the Brits out there!

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Red Sox shopping Lester and Lackey
Top 10 MLB Player Searches