Skip to content

No doubt about it now: Cubs should have fired Hendry

Dec 18, 2009, 6:18 PM EST

hendry bradley.jpgThe Cubs finally got off their collective butts on Friday by pulling the trigger on the Milton Bradley-Carlos Silva deal and closing in on an agreement with Marlon Byrd, but let’s face it, they were better off when they were doing nothing. The offseason’s proceedings have only made it increasingly clear that Jim Hendry is not the right person to run this team.
It’s not so much Hendry’s eye for talent that’s the problem. He’s a perfectly average deal-maker, and he’s come up with a few gems for the Cubs. He might actually be better off with a small-market team, since it’s when he has money to spend that he really gets himself in trouble.
But Hendry isn’t the man to lead a rebuilding effort. He simply lacks imagination. Hendry’s M.O. is to focus one problem at a time and apply all of the available resources to fixing it. Everyone in the whole league knew that Hendry’s first priority this winter was to upgrade in center field, but that he’d only do it after trading Bradley. Because if he went out and signed Mike Cameron before Bradley was disposed of, he’d have lost all of his leverage and had to settle for someone like Silva in return.
Oh… wait….
So, now Bradley is gone, but so are Curtis Granderson and Cameron. That leaves Byrd, a 32-year-old who is average at best in center field and whose recent success offensively is largely a product of playing in Texas. He’s posted OPSs of 814, 842 and 808 the last three years, but his road OPSs those years were 715, 773 and 740. An Alfonso Soriano-Byrd-Kosuke Fukudome outfield is going to be an awful lot more expensive than it will be productive.
And the scary thing is that Byrd’s addition might be the biggest of the winter for one of 2009’s most disappointing teams. Hendry’s other two moves were to re-sign John Grabow to a contract that only Ed Wade would love and to decline to offer arbitration to Rich Harden, costing the team a supplemental first-round pick in next year’s draft. The Cubs may add another starter at some point, but it’s doubtful they’ll be major players in what’s left in free agency or in the trade market. This may very well be the team the Cubs will take into 2010, and as a result, both the Cardinals and Brewers should be feeling pretty good right now.

  1. Joey B - Dec 18, 2009 at 7:18 PM

    Harden signed for less than he’d have made in arbitration, so it is entirely possible he’d have accepted. Other than that, you’re right. Aboslutely nothing about either Bradley or Soriano was unpredictable. Bradley figured to get injured and to explode. Soriano is a decent hitter, without a position to call his own, with a low OBP, signed to a contract that pays him $18M when he is 38 years old. Does no one beleive in the agin process?

  2. Chuck - Jan 1, 2010 at 8:07 AM

    I loved Harden, but he might have ended up another Mark Prior and Kerry Wood throwing the towel game, and would have put pressure on the bull pen. Cubs are like an American League team, swing for the fences,strike out a lot, don’t steal bases, and can’t bunt.

  3. Acai Berry Sam - Feb 16, 2010 at 1:14 AM

    It’s all about acai berry when you turn on the news, tv, or internet sites. You see ads for acai berry constantly, and there are many countries that they thankfully now deliver to.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Cubs shore up rotation with Jon Lester
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. W. Myers (5205)
  2. M. Kemp (3096)
  3. C. McGehee (2784)
  4. W. Middlebrooks (2781)
  5. J. Upton (2655)
  1. J. Kang (2617)
  2. M. Morse (2205)
  3. J. Peavy (1930)
  4. A. Rios (1915)
  5. D. Norris (1747)