<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aaron Harang to the Dodgers is not dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/22/aaron-harang-to-the-dodgers-is-not-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/22/aaron-harang-to-the-dodgers-is-not-dead/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:04:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GimmeSomeSteel</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/22/aaron-harang-to-the-dodgers-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-18073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GimmeSomeSteel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=2946#comment-18073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reds have made a few good moves in the last decade--trading for Brandon Phillips, trading for Arroyo, drafting Votto--but not many, and few if any on Jocketty&#039;s watch.
This proposed deal makes no sense, though.  The Reds got some salary &quot;relief&quot; in the extended/restructured deal with Rolen (a high salary for whom they traded last year for little good reason other than to get rid of Encarnacion), and this wouldn&#039;t help all that much.  Sherrill is good, but not good enough to make this worthwhile for Cincinnati.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reds have made a few good moves in the last decade&#8211;trading for Brandon Phillips, trading for Arroyo, drafting Votto&#8211;but not many, and few if any on Jocketty&#8217;s watch.<br />
This proposed deal makes no sense, though.  The Reds got some salary &#8220;relief&#8221; in the extended/restructured deal with Rolen (a high salary for whom they traded last year for little good reason other than to get rid of Encarnacion), and this wouldn&#8217;t help all that much.  Sherrill is good, but not good enough to make this worthwhile for Cincinnati.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/12/22/aaron-harang-to-the-dodgers-is-not-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-18072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wp/nbchbt/?p=2946#comment-18072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they are the Reds.  I&#039;m not sure they&#039;ve done anything in the past ten years that has made sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they are the Reds.  I&#8217;m not sure they&#8217;ve done anything in the past ten years that has made sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
