Dec 22, 2009, 11:37 AM EDT
I can’t see it. You have Cameron, Ellsbury, and Drew in the outfield. You have Ortiz at DH. Where on Earth would Jason Bay play, and why would the Red Sox pay him five years regardless? Yet you have the Boston Herald’s Mike Silverman saying “It remains unlikely, but still within the realm of possibility, that
either Holliday or Bay could wind up falling into the Red Sox’ laps.”
The only basis he has for such a thing is that (a) Bay has not yet accepted the Mets’ offer; and (b) there was some indication in the Bay camp yesterday that talks were active, and the Mets wouldn’t be talking unless there was another team on the scene.
My guess: this is more market-making by Bay’s agent or Holliday’s agent or what have you. Someone whispers to someone that something may be happening who whispers it along to someone else and by then it’s almost, but not entirely inaccurate to say that “there’s Jason Bay talk.”
And no, I do not claim to be above goin’ along with it. This kind of chatter is the whole point of the hot stove season, right?
- Manny Machado calls $519K salary for 2014 “disappointing” 0
- Kris Medlen leaves game with right forearm strain 18
- Cardinals sign Cuban middle infielder Aledmys Diaz to a four-year major league contract 60
- Cardinals and Matt Carpenter agree to a six-year, $52 million extension 12
- Jet Blue Park is absolutely incredible 59
- Ian Kinsler hopes Rangers go 0-162, calls GM a “sleazeball” (132)
- Albert Pujols was insulted when someone asked him if he can put up Mike Trout numbers (103)
- The politics of “The Cardinal Way” (67)
- Brandon Phillips: “How the [expletive] am I declining?” (61)
- Reporter calls Ian Kinsler as self-absorbed as A-Rod (60)