Jan 2, 2010, 9:25 AM EDT
It could be something spooky and
nefarious like collusion, or perhaps that general managers have become more savvy about how they spend their team’s money (Jim Hendry
excluded, of course), but Jeff Passan of Yahoo! Sports notices that there’s a striking difference between this offseason and 2006-07:
Thus far, more than halfway through the 2009-10 free agent signing
period, teams have given only seven players contracts of three years or
longer. In 2006-07, 31 players received deals of three or more years.
They handed out 29 multi-year contracts that averaged more than $5
million per season. This offseason, owners have given out a dozen
multiyear, $5 million-a-season deals.
The most significant difference? The
big-bank free agents. Teams coughed up over $100 million for Alfonso
Soriano, Barry Zito, Carlos Lee and Daisuke Matsuzaka that winter. On the heels of
a recession, this offseason is a different animal, with less premium
players seemingly entering their prime seasons, like the ones mentioned above. It’s possible that
Jason Bay could have found a $100 million contract in the past, but
that doesn’t mean it would have been wise. Matt Holliday, who turns 30 this month, is the only one
worthy of the threshold in the current marketplace, and there’s
increasing indications that he’ll get there.
Obviously something has changed between then and now, but perhaps the biggest casualty is someone like me. Granted it’s January 2nd, but I’m sitting here recapping someone else’s article about the lack of activity in the free agent marketplace. It’s a sad state of affairs. Someone please rescue us from this current state of Hot Stove boredom.
- 2014 Preview: Chicago Cubs 1
- Manny Machado calls $519K salary for 2014 “disappointing” 34
- Kris Medlen leaves game with right forearm strain 18
- Cardinals sign Cuban middle infielder Aledmys Diaz to a four-year major league contract 60
- Cardinals and Matt Carpenter agree to a six-year, $52 million extension 12