Mar 6, 2010, 11:30 AM EDT
It’s ridiculous. It’s absurd. But the Nationals are considering it. Here’s general manager Mike Rizzo:
“I think already he’s a leader of the club and kind of a pseudo-captain
already,” Rizzo said. “We’ve kicked around the premise of making
somebody the captain of the team, with a ‘C’ on their jersey. I haven’t
come to any conclusion. Zim, obviously, is the leader of the franchise.”
The whole idea of a captain is silly to begin with — and better reserved for the tradition of hockey, in my opinion — but for Rizzo to hedge about who the captain would be is just plain stupid. What, having a hard time deciding between Zimmerman and Alberto Gonzalez?
On a related note, Bill Ladson of MLB.com took an informal poll of his Twitter followers the other day when the idea was originally floated about. Out of 21 polled, 11 felt that Zimmerman deserved the honor, while nine felt he was too young or the Nationals didn’t need a special leader. One said it didn’t matter. Coincidentally, that person is also a genius.
- Albert Pujols was insulted when someone asked him if he can put up Mike Trout numbers (103)
- Manny Machado calls $519K salary for 2014 “disappointing” (88)
- Is Barry Bonds really getting a “fair hearing?” (88)
- Ryan Braun calls himself an “artist,” doesn’t care what fans on the road will shout at him (81)
- Giants players love having Barry Bonds at spring training (77)