Apr 29, 2010, 2:46 PM EDT
Evan Grant reports that if the Rangers sale isn’t done by June, the team will have to take more money from Major League Baseball to make ends meet.
Last year baseball extended the team a $25 million line of credit. They used $16 million of it in 2009 to meet payroll obligations. Grant reports that both payroll and revenue are basically flat compared to last year, which suggests that baseball will have to go beyond that original $25 million. As Grant notes, since baseball is a creditor which expects its money back, the more money it gives to the team the less there is available for the troublesome, sale-blocking creditors, which makes closing the deal even harder. See, cycle, vicious.
What’s worse is that if we get to June and the team is still on the dole, they will be unable to pay real bonuses to their draft picks and, instead, will be required to pay MLB-imposed slot prices, which could seriously hinder the Rangers’ ability to, you know, get good players.
There have been a lot of self-imposed deadlines in this transaction, none of which have done much to spur real action by the parties. The end of May, however, brings with it serious consequences if the deal is not yet done. It would seem, then, that everyone had best get busy.
- 2015 Preview: Cincinnati Reds 33
- The average Major League Baseball salary this year will be more than $4 million — a record 22
- 2015 Preview: Tampa Bay Rays 18
- The Cubs assign Kris Bryant and Addison Russell to the minors, option Javier Baez as well 70
- 2015 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks 8
- 2015 Preview: Toronto Blue Jays 69
- Mariners prospect Victor Sanchez has died 26
- 2015 Preview: Chicago White Sox 15
- Ex-Cardinals outfielder Curt Ford was assaulted in St. Louis and told to “go back to Ferguson” (122)
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” (118)
- Rob Manfred says it would be hard to reinstate Pete Rose in a limited way (91)
- The MLBPA releases a statement on Kris Bryant, mentions possible litigation (90)
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? (88)