May 4, 2010, 7:47 PM EST
Jair Jurrjens told Carroll Rogers of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution that he doesn’t think he will be ready to make his next scheduled start on Saturday.
“If I had to make a decision today, no,” Jurrjens said Tuesday afternoon
before the Braves opened a three-game series with the Nationals. “I
still feel it. I’m not going to risk making it worse by going out there
and trying to do something and miss more than a couple of days. It’s not
Jurrjens left last Thursday’s start against the Cardinals after just one inning due to a strained left hamstring. The Braves hoped that an extra day of rest would do the truck, but considering that Jurrjens doesn’t even think he’d be able to throw a bullpen session in preparation for the outing, it’s time that they formulate a backup plan.
With that in mind, manager Bobby Cox told Rogers that the Braves could look towards a spot-starter like Kris Medlen or Jonny Venters or decide to pluck someone from Triple-A Gwinnett. It doesn’t sound like a DL stint is a consideration for Jurrjens at this time, though that could change if they are forced to make a roster move.
- Matt Harvey makes his return. And he was really impressive. 10
- Hector Olivera’s camp denies any damage to ulnar collateral ligament 3
- UPDATE: Hunter Pence out 6-8 weeks with fracture in left forearm 28
- MLBPA: leaks are from people “who want to see Josh Hamilton hurt personally and professionally” 34
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 145
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 45
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (379)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (146)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- That facts of Josh Hamilton’s case should not be a matter of public record (94)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (90)