May 27, 2010, 11:23 AM EDT
Such a proposition should not need much explaining — and even attempting to explain it should not be interesting — but I’ll be darned if an article from Mark Bradley of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution explaining that very proposition isn’t both illuminating and interesting.
Not so much because of the two players themselves — you know how I feel about both Heyward and Francoeur — but because of what it says about the differences between the baseball mindset (Heyward) and the football mindset (Francoeur). I’ve never really thought too hard about Jeff Francoeur as a football player, but I can’t help but think that my distaste for him as a player has just as much to do with my perceptions of his mentality than they do his performance for my team.
Indeed, Francoeur now plays — badly — for a team I don’t much care for. This should make me happy on some shallow level. It doesn’t though. I’m still just as frustrated at him now as I was when he played for the Braves. And I think it has to do with the temperament issues Bradley hits on in his piece more than anything else.
- Astros “making a strong effort” for Phillies ace Cole Hamels 22
- Angels acquire outfielders David Murphy and David DeJesus 22
- Jenrry Mejia gets 162-game ban for second failed PED test 40
- Nationals, Phillies agree to Jonathan Papelbon trade 63
- The Hall of Fame just made a MAJOR change to the Hall of Fame voting process 75
- Royals make another big move, get Ben Zobrist from A’s 91
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 49
- The Troy Tulowitzki trade might be the strangest deadline deal ever 40
- The MLBPA is considering withholding cooperation with ESPN, Fox over Colin Cowherd’s comments (157)
- The Cubs are in discussions with the Phillies on Cole Hamels (146)
- Colin Cowherd wonders how baseball can be considered “complicated” if Dominicans can understand it (129)
- Major League Baseball rips Colin Cowherd in an official statement (123)
- Settling the Scores: Wednesday’s results (106)