May 27, 2010, 11:23 AM EST
Such a proposition should not need much explaining — and even attempting to explain it should not be interesting — but I’ll be darned if an article from Mark Bradley of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution explaining that very proposition isn’t both illuminating and interesting.
Not so much because of the two players themselves — you know how I feel about both Heyward and Francoeur — but because of what it says about the differences between the baseball mindset (Heyward) and the football mindset (Francoeur). I’ve never really thought too hard about Jeff Francoeur as a football player, but I can’t help but think that my distaste for him as a player has just as much to do with my perceptions of his mentality than they do his performance for my team.
Indeed, Francoeur now plays — badly — for a team I don’t much care for. This should make me happy on some shallow level. It doesn’t though. I’m still just as frustrated at him now as I was when he played for the Braves. And I think it has to do with the temperament issues Bradley hits on in his piece more than anything else.
- Rockies acquire Brett Anderson from A’s 11
- D’backs, Angels, White Sox agree to three-team Mark Trumbo deal 62
- Ranking MLB managers by . . . handsomeness 74
- Curtis Granderson: “A lot of people have told me real New Yorkers are Mets fans” 60
- The Phillies have told teams they’d trade Cliff Lee and Cole Hamels 53
- Robinson Cano agrees to $240 million deal with Mariners (260)
- Report: Mariners willing to offer Robinson Cano a 10-year, $240 million deal (143)
- Report: Yankees have agreed to a three-year deal with Carlos Beltran (125)
- Brett Gardner is drawing “significant” trade interest (113)
- Robinson Cano “didn’t want to play” for Joe Girardi (110)