Jun 26, 2010, 4:28 PM EDT
According to Ken Rosenthal of FOXSports.com, the Diamondbacks will give Edwin Jackson two extra days of rest, pushing his next scheduled start back to next Friday against the Dodgers.
Jackson threw 149 pitches in his no-hitter against the Rays on Friday night, the highest pitch count in one game since Livan Hernandez threw 150 pitches on June 3, 2005.
It’s often stated as gospel that such an inflated pitch count will mean that a pitcher will fare worse in their next start or have an increased chance at injury. I have no evidence one way or the other on that one — in fact, J.C. Bradbury finds a pretty negligible difference — but for a team that is buried in last place in the National League West, there’s no need for the Diamondbacks to push their luck.
An interesting side note, Ben Goessling of MASNSports.com hears that the Nationals were exploring a trade for Jackson. The 26-year-old right-hander avoided arbitration with the Diamondbacks by signing a two-year, $13.5 million contract in February. He will make $8.35 million next season before becoming a free agent for the first time.
- World Series, Game 4: Royals vs. Giants lineups 1
- Report: Rays owner Stuart Sternberg has discussed moving the team to Montreal 38
- Dave Dombrowski on Miguel Cabrera: “It’s worse than what we ever would have anticipated” 23
- World Series Reset: Can the Giants even things up? 4
- Behind strong bullpen, Royals edge Giants 3-2 to take a 2-1 World Series lead 35
- Paul Konerko, Jimmy Rollins named co-winners of the Roberto Clemente Award 4
- The greatest trick this Royals bullpen ever pulled … 3
- Adam Wainwright underwent elbow surgery to “trim” cartilage 13
- Shocker! Joe Maddon to opt out of his contract and leave the Rays (143)
- Erroneous Narrative Alert: no, the Giants are not a “gritty,” anti-stats organization (122)
- Pedro Martinez has some opinions about who the new “face of baseball” is (112)
- PANTY RAID! Homeland Security agents confiscate unlicensed Kansas City Royals underwear (109)
- The World Series ratings are low. So what? (101)