Jul 13, 2010, 11:20 AM EDT
Adam Dunn was really enthused about signing a contract extension with the Nats earlier this year, but that enthusiasm has waned, Buster Olney reports, as the Nats have been less eager and trade speculation has risen.
On that count, Nats’ GM Mike Rizzo has said that it would take “an extraordinary deal” to trade Dunn. But if Rizzo is that attached to Dunn, you’d think that Rizzo would be working harder to do an extension. Because unlike a lot of guys, Dunn might very well accept an arbitration offer if one is made at the end of the season. And of course, if an offer isn’t made, the Nats won’t get a draft pick or two if Dunn changes course and decides to sign with another team.
I guess I could see the Nats and Dunn sort of waltzing passive-aggressively into another year together, but it doesn’t make a ton of sense. If I’m Rizzo and I’m not sold on extending Dunn, I trade him right now.
- Report: Rangers will pay Josh Hamilton less than $7 million; deal includes opt-out after two years 87
- Suspensions announced for Thursday’s brawl between the White Sox and Royals 75
- Settling the Score: Friday’s results 81
- Report: Angels, Rangers agree on Josh Hamilton trade 69
- Must-Click Link: Alex Rodriguzez: the slugger with a thousand faces 22
- And That Happened: Thursday’s scores and highlights 115
- The Royals and White Sox had a benches-clearing fracas, five players ejected 155
- Bartolo Colon picks off a baserunner. By running him down all by himself. 55
- The early leaders in MLB’s “Franchise Four” thing have been announced (166)
- The Royals and White Sox had a benches-clearing fracas, five players ejected (155)
- Kelvin Herrera gets a five-game suspension; Yordano Ventura fined (133)
- Jose Bautista and the Orioles exchanged some words last night (117)
- Joe Buck has a truly awful suggestion about how to improve MLB broadcasts (116)