Jul 13, 2010, 11:20 AM EDT
Adam Dunn was really enthused about signing a contract extension with the Nats earlier this year, but that enthusiasm has waned, Buster Olney reports, as the Nats have been less eager and trade speculation has risen.
On that count, Nats’ GM Mike Rizzo has said that it would take “an extraordinary deal” to trade Dunn. But if Rizzo is that attached to Dunn, you’d think that Rizzo would be working harder to do an extension. Because unlike a lot of guys, Dunn might very well accept an arbitration offer if one is made at the end of the season. And of course, if an offer isn’t made, the Nats won’t get a draft pick or two if Dunn changes course and decides to sign with another team.
I guess I could see the Nats and Dunn sort of waltzing passive-aggressively into another year together, but it doesn’t make a ton of sense. If I’m Rizzo and I’m not sold on extending Dunn, I trade him right now.
- Giants stomp Royals 7-1 in World Series Game 1 rout 1
- World Series, Game 1: Giants vs. Royals lineups 0
- HBT Daily: In which I waffle on my World Series pick 13
- Must-click link: surviving spring training on $0 a day 78
- Your Official HardballTalk World Series Preview 28
- World Series Reset: Game 1 — finally! — is tonight 31
- HBT Daily: How the Royals and Giants were built 4
- Two radio stations in San Francisco are refusing to play Lorde’s “Royals” during the World Series 40
- So, if you’re not a fan of the Royals or Giants, who ya got? (120)
- Erroneous Narrative Alert: no, the Giants are not a “gritty,” anti-stats organization (115)
- Pedro Martinez has some opinions about who the new “face of baseball” is (111)
- “The Kansas City Royals Are the Future of Baseball” — someone actually said that. (93)
- Travis Ishikawa sends Giants to World Series on walk-off three-run homer (79)