Skip to content

No waiver deal for Adam Dunn

Aug 11, 2010, 3:01 PM EDT

This is not a big surprise, but Jon Paul Morosi makes it official that Adam Dunn (a) was claimed on waivers; and (b) the time for a waiver deal to be worked out expired on Monday, thereby rendering any deal of Dunn impossible.  I’ve heard speculation that the Dodgers claimed him and some counter-speculation that it was the Phillies. Probably doesn’t matter.

The interesting thing about all of this is what the Nats do now.  As MLBTR reports, Dunn is definitely going to be a Type-A free agent, theoretically allowing the Nats to collect two draft picks for him.  But if he goes to a team that signs other type-A free agents like the Yankees just might, that limits the Nats’ return because teams are only forced to give up so many picks.

Likewise, to get those picks, the Nats will have to arbitration. While I think it’s less likely that Dunn will accept this year than he might have in years past — there seems to be a growing appreciation of his skills these days — there’s a chance he might, and that would stick the Nats with a big one-year deal they may not want.

I’m a big Dunn whore, so it’s no surprise I’d be advocating for the Nats to re-sign him. But in this case, it might have the added benefit of being the smart play.

  1. Kevin S. - Aug 11, 2010 at 3:11 PM

    Nats definitely want Dunn back – I can’t see how they don’t offer him arb, especially considering how that would likely depress his market value (I don’t see the Yanks signing him, so getting a sandwich and a third isn’t a huge risk).

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Who are the favorites for Rookie of the Year?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. J. Soler (3590)
  2. Y. Molina (3378)
  3. R. Castillo (3234)
  4. D. Wright (2293)
  5. D. Murphy (2167)
  1. S. Doolittle (2124)
  2. B. Colon (2122)
  3. B. Posey (2093)
  4. D. Ortiz (2086)
  5. T. Lincecum (2023)