Sep 6, 2010, 11:01 AM EDT
After beating the Diamondbacks on August 25 the Padres had a 76-49 record and 6.5-game lead in the NL West. They’d won three games in a row and 13 of their last 16, and their odds of winning the division were over 90 percent.
And they haven’t won since, dropping their 10th consecutive game yesterday while being swept by the Rockies. San Diego’s lead in the division is down to one game over San Francisco and 4.5 games over Colorado, and now various projections have their NL West-winning odds at around 55-60 percent.
Only two teams in baseball history have made the playoffs after a 10-game losing streak, with the most recent being the 1982 Braves and the most famous being Bobby Thomson and the 1951 Giants.
Also working against the Padres is a very tough remaining schedule that includes six straight series against above-.500 teams before finishing the season with a four-game set against the Cubs. They’ll try to snap the streak tonight against the Dodgers, in San Diego, and then face the Giants, Rockies, Cardinals, Dodgers again, and Reds.
In other words, there will be no backing into the playoffs for the year’s most surprising contenders.
- Shoeless Joe Jackson is not being reinstated 14
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 30
- Cubs acquire Austin Jackson from Mariners 22
- Unknown Cuban ballplayer sleeps outside of Dodger Stadium, hoping for a tryout 32
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 74
- Jake Arrieta no-hits the Dodgers with 12 strikeouts 32
- Blue Jays will name Mark Shapiro as the new team president 31
- Lance Lynn expects to make next scheduled start despite suffering ankle injury Saturday 2
- Sarah Palin sticks up for Curt Schilling, tells ESPN to “stick to sports” (266)
- Dan Patrick: When does ESPN cut ties with Curt Schilling? (201)
- Curt Schilling taken off of Little League World Series duty for making a really bad tweet (170)
- Curt Schilling taken off of ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball telecast this week (134)
- Phillies announcer calls Mets fans “obnoxious” (124)