Skip to content

Will the phantom HBP change the way people think about Derek Jeter?

Sep 16, 2010, 6:50 AM EDT

In the grand scheme of things it was a silly little play. But is it the kind of thing that will change the Derek Jeter Can Do No Wrong narrative we've been hearing for the past 15 years?

I’ve been chewing on the phantom Jeter hit-by-pitch since last night. Logically speaking it was a small, silly play that made me chuckle. But it got me thinking about bigger, less logical issues about Jeter, his place in the cosmos, the media and that kind of stuff.

In
years past, this would almost certainly be called “a heads up play” by Jeter. He would
be seen as being gritty or resourceful or whatever. Doing whatever it took to win.
I have yet to read the New York papers this morning, but if I had to guess I’d say that will still likely be the story today. 

But I can’t help but think that there’s someone in
the New York media landscape — be it a columnist or a talk radio host or whoever — who is thinking hard
about calling this one differently. Someone who’s thinking of casting the move as desperation rather than resourcefulness, and who will use it as a hook for a larger story
about Derek Jeter being “lost at sea” and, for the first time, casting
him as a pitiful figure
in their next column or their 8:45 segment or whatever.

To be clear, I wouldn’t buy into such a notion, because it would be reading way too much into a silly play. More bluntly, it would be a big a pile of
baloney, as is any characterization of a ballplayer based on a freakish, flukish kind of play. Stuff happens on a baseball diamond. But it got me thinking that such characterizations happen all the time, especially in the hyper-competitive media atmosphere in New York, and especially with big figures like Derek Jeter.

Because let’s not kid ourselves: while a “desperate Jeter” storyline would be baloney, so too have been the 15 years of “Jeter-is-God” storylines we’ve been steadily fed by the media.  Yes, there have been plenty of reasons to praise Jeter, but we’ve long since passed the time when the narrative — Captain Jeter: The Man Who Plays The Game The Right Way — took on a life of its own.

But such a narrative, being a mere construction of the media, is not something that has to last forever. At some point, almost every public figure falls out of favor to some degree. Or, if the figure was viewed negatively in the past, a redemption story comes along that the media finds irresistible. It doesn’t take a scandal or a singular act of heroism or what have you for the winds to shift. Sometimes they shift simply because a couple of influential voices decide that they’re bored with the old narrative and come up with a new one. Indeed, oftentimes the narrative shift is accompanied by later pieces examining why, exactly, the narrative shifted, because it wasn’t at all clear in the first place.

But more often there’s a catalyst. Alex Rodriguez — a subject of a media-approved narrative of his own* — wasn’t talked about the way he is now until he signed that $250 million deal which has come to color everything he says or does. Roger Clemens now has a much longer and sustained track record of being rather un-hinged, but throwing the bat at Mike Piazza changed the way he was talked about overnight, long before we knew much of anything about his personal life. Once the story changes, everything about the figure in question is seen through a particular prism and the narrative takes on a life of its own.

The Captain Jeter: The Man Who Plays The Game The Right Way narrative has lasted a long, long time. Way longer than most of these things do.  As I sit here this morning, ready to leap into the tabloids and blogs and maybe — just maybe — tune into some talk radio, I can’t help but wonder if there isn’t someone out there who wants to get ahead of the pack. Who wants to be the first to cast the hit-by-pitch play as a symbol for Jeter’s struggles in 2010 and, more broadly, the Yankees’ struggles down the stretch.

I hope not, because like I said, in my mind this was a funny little play. And because I don’t believe that any given act on a baseball diamond provides a window into a man’s psyche or soul or whatever. 

But I think I may be in the minority in believing such things. And I can’t help but think that the opportunity to say something provocative about Derek Jeter is too tempting for someone to pass up.

UPDATE: The first step in this direction was taken by a blogger — Steve S. at TYU — not columnists or talk radio.

*You know the narrative: “Alex Rodriguez: Self-Centered Prima Donna” It seems that no matter what he does, his actions are cast in such a light whenever he does something newsworthy. If you question this, let us ponder what the story would be this morning if it were A-Rod, and not Jeter, who faked getting hit by that pitch last night. If you need help, just go back to the “I got it” controversy, which in many ways is the same kind of thing Jeter did with the hit-by-pitch.

  1. D-Luxxx - Sep 16, 2010 at 4:34 PM

    I think he was referring to trying to find somebody bashing Jeter for his act. It’s called reading comprehension all great and powerful Oz.

  2. D-Luxxx - Sep 16, 2010 at 4:37 PM

    That makes my head hurt. I actually think it would take me more time to type in “text” than it would for me to do it otherwise.

  3. Kevin S. - Sep 16, 2010 at 8:33 PM

    No, I was talking about pitchers OPS+ing -3 or so.

  4. Ditto65 - Sep 16, 2010 at 9:19 PM

    How is Girardi one of the worst managers in baseball? How many mangers in baseball today have won a World Series? How many mangers in baseball today have won while dealing with the New York Press? The Steinbrenners? Please qualify your assumption by marching out a line of managers better than Girardi. Objective, not subjective.

  5. apterix - Sep 16, 2010 at 11:15 PM

    A maroon is someone who doesn’t know what a maroon is.

  6. apterix - Sep 17, 2010 at 1:11 AM

    Baseball as a long and colorful history of tricks, some of them (e.g. the hidden ball trick) are legal, others (e.g. doctoring the ball) were once but no longer legal, still others (e.g. interference) have never been legal.

  7. zimmer00 - Sep 17, 2010 at 11:31 AM

    Good for you. Let’s put it plainly cheating is cheating, lying is lying. Even if you admit to it later on. You you want to teach your child to do this? What ever happened to true role models (parents).

  8. sportsorgtfo.com - Sep 17, 2010 at 4:09 PM

    Check out a really good response to this whole issue at the following link.http://www.sportsorgtfo.com/derek-jeter-hardly-a-cheater/

  9. Cleareye - Sep 21, 2010 at 7:37 PM

    One of the few likable Yankees just became less so.

  10. walk - Sep 25, 2010 at 5:41 PM

    My opinion remains unchanged.

  11. twentyseventoseven - Oct 13, 2010 at 11:11 PM

    Why would they change their way of thinking about Jeet when they still view him as a great player.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Who's to blame for Cubs tarp fiasco?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. R. Castillo (3317)
  2. M. Cuddyer (2996)
  3. K. Bryant (2461)
  4. A. Garcia (2387)
  5. W. Myers (2245)
  1. J. Werth (2219)
  2. A. McCutchen (2162)
  3. Y. Molina (2138)
  4. T. Frazier (1924)
  5. M. Fiers (1918)