Sep 21, 2010, 3:05 PM EST
If your answer is “because he wants top dollar in free agency and Scott Boras is the man to get it for him,” you may be wrong.
In a story I didn’t see because Newsday is behind a really expensive paywall, Ken Davidoff reported that one of Werth’s goals is to pay his agent a smaller cut of his next contract, working instead on a fee, rather than a commission basis. We all think that Boras is out for every buck, but if that’s what Werth wanted, one can assume it’s what Boras gave to him.
And if Boras is working on a fee basis, could it not also mean that “top dollar at any cost” are not his marching orders? I have a hard time seeing Werth sign a big deal with Philly due to the number of large contracts they have already, but it is possible, is it not, that Boras on something other than a commission might try to find a creative means of keeping Werth in town?
- Merry Christmas from HBT! 74
- THE YEAR IN REVIEW: HBT’s most commented-upon stories of the year 86
- The Yankees are treating Alex Rodriguez differently than they treated Derek Jeter. So what? 40
- Braves sign setup man Jason Grilli to two-year contract 15
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot 120
- Phil Hughes signs a three-year extension with the Twins 27
- The Padres have talked to the Phillies about Cole Hamels 24
- Why is John Smoltz a shoo-in for the Hall of Fame? 65
- Curt Schilling goes after Obama, says Ronald Reagan would watch “The Interview” (239)
- My Imaginary Hall of Fame Ballot (120)
- Today’s specious anti-Mike Piazza-for-the-Hall-Fame argument (96)
- THE YEAR IN REVIEW: HBT’s most commented-upon stories of the year (86)
- Phillies GM told Ryan Howard they’d be better off “not with him but without him” (85)