Oct 8, 2010, 1:00 PM EDT
This morning I linked to Amy Nelson’s story about the players wanting a sit-down with the umpires and the league after the season. My take: “This is so manifestly reasonable that you know damn well it will never happen.”
A rare meeting between Major League Baseball players, umpires and
league officials to discuss player-umpire relationships, and possibly
instant replay, is set for Dec. 3.
I’m not sure what will come out of it really, but I see the following two outcomes as the best and worst case scenarios:
Best: Umpires hear what the players are saying about the umps’ attitudes, players get a better appreciation for how difficult and how stressful the umps’ job is, and it results in calmer, more rational on-field disagreements and a new sense of transparency and accountability when bad calls are made, which they inevitably will be;
Worst: The umpires use the meeting to document specific player complaints, thereby allowing them to add to their list of players they intend to screw with bad calls next season.
But hey, this is progress, right?
- Rangers activate Josh Hamilton from disabled list, send prospect Joey Gallo to Triple-A 9
- Huston Street says he’d retire if he was used like a 1970s-style fireman 43
- CC Sabathia looks like a reliever 24
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 58
- AL All-Star voting update: now “only” five Royals in the starting lineup 59
- Andy MacPhail introduced by the Phillies. And the first topic of conversation is sabermetrics 20
- What a world: Orioles are in first place and Ubaldo Jimenez has been their ace 16
- Settling the Scores: Sunday’s results 99
- With the same-sex marriage decision, the San Francisco Giants get another big win (275)
- Joe Maddon is the latest manager to rip instant replay. He’s got a point. (109)
- Settling the Scores: Sunday’s results (99)
- And That Happened: Wednesday’s scores and highlights (75)
- There was a super ump show in Chicago yesterday (75)