Oct 8, 2010, 1:00 PM EDT
This morning I linked to Amy Nelson’s story about the players wanting a sit-down with the umpires and the league after the season. My take: “This is so manifestly reasonable that you know damn well it will never happen.”
A rare meeting between Major League Baseball players, umpires and
league officials to discuss player-umpire relationships, and possibly
instant replay, is set for Dec. 3.
I’m not sure what will come out of it really, but I see the following two outcomes as the best and worst case scenarios:
Best: Umpires hear what the players are saying about the umps’ attitudes, players get a better appreciation for how difficult and how stressful the umps’ job is, and it results in calmer, more rational on-field disagreements and a new sense of transparency and accountability when bad calls are made, which they inevitably will be;
Worst: The umpires use the meeting to document specific player complaints, thereby allowing them to add to their list of players they intend to screw with bad calls next season.
But hey, this is progress, right?
- Giants inhaling the air of superiority after Game 1 4
- What’s in a name? “Big Game” James did not come up big for Kansas City 19
- World Series Reset: The Royals look to pick themselves up off the mat 5
- Royals’ World Series hopes in Yordano Ventura’s hands 4
- Giants stomp Royals 7-1 in World Series Game 1 rout 33
- World Series, Game 1: Giants vs. Royals lineups 0
- HBT Daily: In which I waffle on my World Series pick 13
- Must-click link: surviving spring training on $0 a day 80
- So, if you’re not a fan of the Royals or Giants, who ya got? (120)
- Erroneous Narrative Alert: no, the Giants are not a “gritty,” anti-stats organization (116)
- Pedro Martinez has some opinions about who the new “face of baseball” is (111)
- “The Kansas City Royals Are the Future of Baseball” — someone actually said that. (93)
- Must-click link: surviving spring training on $0 a day (80)