Skip to content

The latest on the Dodgers and the McCourts

Oct 21, 2010, 1:37 PM EDT

Image (1) mccourts.jpg for post 4068

For those Dodgers fans who aren’t jumping on the Giants bandwagon — anyone? — Bill Shaikin of the Times has the latest. Among the interesting points:

  • While Frank has taken over baseball operations from fired team President Dennis Mannion, a man named Geoff Wharton, whose background is in real estate, not sports, has taken over business operations. This would suggest to me that Frank’s plans to develop the Dodger Stadium parking lot remain front-burnered. Which is rather depressing;
  • Some talk about what might happen if Jamie wins the court case. This passage is curious: “Jamie realizes the chance of other owners approving her as proprietor of the Dodgers is close to zero.” You know, nothing good at all has come out of this case so far, but if Jamie does win, and a court says, yes, she does and always has been owner of the Dodgers, watching Major League Baseball attempt to keep her out of the owners club would be pretty hilarious. Maybe not worth it, but certainly something redeeming, as I think the fact that baseball thinks it can legally pick and choose owners is downright ridiculous; and
  • People in Los Angeles are actually hoping Magic Johnson might buy the team.  I know he’s a mogul and all, but that’s a pretty sad comment.  Johnson dismisses the idea out of hand because unlike Dodgers fans, he’s not suffering from abuse-induced delusions.

But hey, how about them Giants!

  1. apbaguy - Oct 21, 2010 at 2:34 PM

    For all the EPL drama, MLB has its own sordid little stories. Can’t someone please dig up some 19 year old swimsuit model and connect her to Frank via video? After all, i’s LA, baby.

  2. WhenMattStairsIsKing - Oct 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM

    Can someone please come up with a good ‘McCourts in court’ play on words?

  3. The Rabbit - Oct 21, 2010 at 6:13 PM

    “If Jamie does win, and a court says, yes, she does and always has been owner of the Dodgers, watching Major League Baseball attempt to keep her out of the owners club would be pretty hilarious.”
    Yeah, it would be extremely funny. I can’t even begin to imagine the arguments.
    It does raise a question…If in fact the courts do rule that she has always been owner of the Dodgers, wouldn’t she have been tacitly or “de facto” approved (I don’t know the appropriate legal term) by the old boys club, thereby making any argument by MLB moot?

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Do the Angels have any weaknesses?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. G. Stanton (3753)
  2. A. Rizzo (2494)
  3. R. Castillo (2397)
  4. B. Belt (2190)
  5. A. Pujols (2096)
  1. H. Ryu (2031)
  2. C. Young (2006)
  3. J. Hamilton (1942)
  4. C. Davis (1845)
  5. E. Gattis (1806)