Skip to content

Jim Leyritz broke down in court yesterday

Nov 5, 2010, 1:59 PM EDT

Leyrtiz in court

I’ve not been following everything that’s been going on in Jim Leyritz’s trial, but a couple notable things happened this week:

  • On Tuesday, the defense was able to ask a coworker of the victim’s how much she had been drinking before she drove off and, ultimately, got into the accident. A lot, it seems!  Only problem: the judge had previously ruled that evidence of the victim’s drunkenness was irrelevant and inadmissible in the case, which is about whether Leyrtiz ran a red light. The best part: the prosecution didn’t object. Not once. And then the prosecutor got up and started asking his own questions about the victim’s state. At which point the judge went crazy and cleared the jurors room.  That could have been grounds for a mistrial, but the judge let it go on for some reason;
  • Yesterday, during a witness’ testimony about the accident scene, Leyritz broke down sobbing at the defense table. He couldn’t control himself, and the judge let Leyritz leave the room to compose himself. He couldn’t do it, and he could be heard loudly sobbing from behind a door.

Contrary to the way it’s supposed to work, I think — and this really is just my opinion based on interactions with jurors —  a lot of  jurors come into a trial leaning towards a presumption of guilt and, rather than look for evidence that establishes guilt, they look for reasons to acquit. Something to grab onto in order to help them to change their minds. Here, in the space of a couple of days the Leyrtiz jury (a) has been reminded that the victim was drunk too; and (b) was given a lot of reason to pity Leyritz.

I have no idea what’s going to happen with this thing, but neither of these events are particularly great for the prosecution’s case.

  1. Jonny 5 - Nov 5, 2010 at 2:22 PM

    If this does get tossed it’s disgusting. Regardless of the inebriety of the victim, he killed a person running a light while drunk. It could have been a kid on a bike, and not a drunk woman. And I’m sure prosecution will remind the jury of this appropriately. Slam dunk isn’t the word for what this case should be. Wouldn’t the “pity” part be more useful to him at sentencing time?

  2. Glenn - Nov 5, 2010 at 10:26 PM

    Maybe he stopped her from killing a bus full of orphans. If the horrible accident did not happen and she had been pulled over, she would be vilified (if she were famous) as a potential murderer. Instead, she is a victim.

  3. Old Gator - Nov 6, 2010 at 12:08 PM

    This judge doesn’t sound particularly alert, does he?

    Is Judge Ito available?

    • bigharold - Nov 6, 2010 at 1:01 PM

      I think Ito is holding out for American Idle, .. or is it Idol?

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. D. Wright (2952)
  2. D. Span (2494)
  3. G. Stanton (2427)
  4. J. Fernandez (2410)
  5. G. Springer (2374)
  1. Y. Puig (2279)
  2. F. Rodney (2196)
  3. M. Teixeira (2150)
  4. G. Perkins (2057)
  5. H. Olivera (1913)