Skip to content

We don’t care about umpire development. We just want the right calls made.

Nov 8, 2010, 1:00 PM EDT

Joyce blown call

There was an essay in the New York Times over the weekend about the state of umpiring. The author, Bruce Weber, who wrote a book about umpiring in 2009, says that replay would be bad a thing. Why? Well, human element and Alexander Cartwright and all of that.  What does Weber think is preferable? Better training:

But instead of reducing the role of umpires by expanding replay, why not help them improve?

The way to do this is for baseball to begin thinking of umpires as they do players, as assets to be maximized.

Players, as they develop in the minor leagues, are overseen by major league clubs, but Major League Baseball plays a minimal role in the development of umpires. In fact, the system that feeds umpires to the big leagues is meant to encourage them to quit before they get there.

Weber suggests intensive, year-round training for umpires. Better pay when they’re in the minors. Recruitment of better candidates. Allowing umpires to make “subtle adjustments” in their technique in an effort to do better on close calls, what with how it’s almost impossible, Weber writes, for umps to be in the right position a lot of the time given that players are moving and jumping and that there are so many variables in play.

Interesting ideas, I guess, but at the end of the day I don’t see how any of that is preferable to simply letting a guy look at a screen and say seven words on a walkie talkie down to the field once or twice a game when there’s a close, blown call.

Indeed, the only argument Weber seems to have in opposition to that is that umpires are “part of the fabric of the game.”  While I’m sure they’re a lot of nice umpires who take their craft seriously, the fans simply don’t care. We don’t want them gone — that would be weird — but at the same time, we don’t care about “encouraging them” or what have you. We want the calls right. That’s really the beginning and the end of it.  If we’re going to spend time working on umpires, let’s work on their attitude and demeanor and keep ugly scenes between players and umps from happening.  But as far as a the calls are concerned, let the umpires continue to make them all. Just let someone with a better, video-enhanced view correct the small handful of mistakes that happen during a game.

  1. Jonny 5 - Nov 8, 2010 at 2:25 PM

    I think Replay would be more cost effective and immediate. Umps will get better when shown how bad they are. Won’t they? Or at least we could see poor performers canned, you know, like the players they’re paid to officiate……

  2. JBerardi - Nov 8, 2010 at 4:59 PM

    So, Webber is saying we should improve umpires instead of using video replay? Well, BOTH sound like a good idea to me. I mean, what makes these two plans mutually exclusive?

  3. Detroit Michael - Nov 9, 2010 at 3:50 PM

    I recommend reading Weber’s book. However, his objectivity may compromised. He may have had to essentially promise that it would be mostly favorable to umpires’ viewpoint to get so many of them to participate in his interviews.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Colby-on-Colby crime in Toronto
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. H. Street (3524)
  2. C. Lee (2589)
  3. T. Tulowitzki (2402)
  4. H. Ramirez (2401)
  5. Y. Puig (2190)
  1. T. Walker (2108)
  2. B. Belt (2064)
  3. D. Price (2036)
  4. D. Uggla (1949)
  5. D. Salazar (1898)