Nov 17, 2010, 3:46 PM EDT
Oakland has wasted little time making moves this offseason, bidding $17 million for the negotiating rights to Japanese pitcher Hisashi Iwakuma, trading Vin Mazzaro and Justin Marks to the Royals for David DeJesus, claiming Edwin Encarnacion off waivers from the Blue Jays, and spending $800,000 to sign 16-year-old prospect Vicmal De La Cruz out of the Dominican Republic.
And now Enrique Rojas of ESPNDeportes.com reports that the A’s have offered free agent third baseman Adrian Beltre a five-year, $64 million contract.
That may not actually get Beltre signed, as he’s coming off an MVP-caliber season and is reportedly being pursued by a ton of teams, but five years and $64 million is the exact same contract he accepted from the Mariners in his first crack at free agency and the normally budget-conscious A’s coming out of the gates with that type of proposal is certainly surprising.
Oakland was in the mix for Beltre last offseason, but he ended up choosing a one-year, $10 million deal from Boston in the hopes of reestablishing his value as an elite player and hitting the open market again. He did just that and now the price tag for Beltre is in a whole different stratosphere.
- The Cubs assign Kris Bryant and Addison Russell to the minors, option Javier Baez as well 16
- 2015 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks 4
- 2015 Preview: Toronto Blue Jays 50
- Mariners prospect Victor Sanchez has died 24
- 2015 Preview: Chicago White Sox 15
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? 87
- 2015 Preview: Atlanta Braves 15
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” 118
- Ex-Cardinals outfielder Curt Ford was assaulted in St. Louis and told to “go back to Ferguson” (122)
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” (118)
- Mo’ne Davis says college ballplayer who wrote an offensive tweet about her deserves a second chance (89)
- Rob Manfred says it would be hard to reinstate Pete Rose in a limited way (89)
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? (87)