Skip to content

Why are the Braves moving Martin Prado to left field instead of Dan Uggla?

Nov 18, 2010, 1:18 PM EDT

dan-uggla-marlins

David O’Brien of the Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that Martin Prado had no problem with the Braves’ request that he move to left field following the trade for Dan Uggla.

General manager Frank Wren talked to Prado after making the trade and quoted the All-Star infielder as saying: “I just want to be a part of this team. I want to contribute. I don’t care where I play.”

Prado deserves credit for taking that stance when many other players have scoffed at position switches, but it’s unclear if keeping Uggla at second base and moving Prado to left field makes sense for the Braves in the first place.

Uggla is universally regarded as a poor defensive second baseman whether you trust your eyes, error totals, mainstream perceptions, or advanced defensive metrics. Prado doesn’t fare exceptionally well in advanced defensive metrics either, but he rates better than Uggla and is generally perceived as clearly above average at second base. So why not use Prado at second base and move Uggla to left field?

On paper that seems like a relative no-brainer that would make the Braves’ defense better, but there are a few other factors at play. For one thing Prado has quite a bit more experience as an outfielder, albeit mostly in winter ball. Beyond that it’s possible Uggla would balk at being asked to switch positions one season away from free agency, as his market value as a left fielder could be quite a bit different than as a second baseman.

And last but not least the Braves are planning for 2011 with the idea that they may need to account for Chipper Jones being out of the lineup for long stretches. Prado would be the fill-in for Jones at third base and it’s likely easier to move him back to the infield and plug in another outfielder than it would be to have Uggla shifting back and forth.

Uggla at second base and Prado in left field probably makes the Braves’ defense worse, but deciding where to play them isn’t quite that simple.

  1. WhenMattStairsIsKing - Nov 18, 2010 at 1:25 PM

    Heck, let Uggla play 1B. They don’t have one right now, and Uggla’s defense would be minimized there while still being regarded as an elite infielder a year from now.

    • Chris Fiorentino's Rash - Nov 18, 2010 at 2:08 PM

      Freddie Freeman will be starting at 1B

      • WhenMattStairsIsKing - Nov 18, 2010 at 2:25 PM

        With that lack of power? Have fun with that.

  2. BC - Nov 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM

    Has Chipper Jones even decided if he’s going to play next year?

    • WhenMattStairsIsKing - Nov 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM

      He’s under contract through 2012, so yes, he decided.

  3. dodger88 - Nov 18, 2010 at 2:33 PM

    It’s a no brainer becuase Uggla has made it clear he wants to play second and nowhere else.

  4. bluesoxbaseball - Nov 18, 2010 at 3:39 PM

    Continuing Craig’s theme: playing any position just to be part of the team is more “blue collar” than refusing to switch positions because you’re in a contract year.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

The Jon Lester-Yoenis Cespedes trade is a win-win
Top 10 MLB Player Searches