Comments on: Michael Weiner on the Marvin Miller snub

By: crankyfrankie

crankyfrankie — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:07:09 +0000

Congratulations to the hall for once again getting it completely wrong! The impact he had on the game speaks for itself. This is just reprehensible.

By: mrfloydpink

mrfloydpink — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 22:22:16 +0000

Great point! After all, it is impossible to have an important or long-lasting impact on the game of baseball off of the playing field.

By: paperlions

paperlions — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:36:54 +0000

This is silly. The building has two sections. One being the HOF, and one being the museum. Miller belongs in the museum, not in the HOF. Of course, I believe the same thing about any owners or commissioners that have be “elected” to the HOF.

By: Detroit Michael

Detroit Michael — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:28:57 +0000

Speaking of snubs, you might want to correct the spelling of Michael Weiner’s name.

I wouldn’t exactly call it a “snub” when a majority of committee members voted for Miller, but not a high enough majority to get him into the Hall of Fame. That’s being picky though: I think he should go in.