Dec 8, 2010, 4:49 PM EST
I’m not sure why any team would feel the need to give a multi-year contract to a 36-year-old, career-long utility infielder with a lifetime OPS under .700, but the Reds did just that by inking Miguel Cairo to a two-year deal.
In fairness Cairo is coming off one of the best seasons of his career, hitting .290/.353/.410 for his highest OPS since 2004, but that came in just 266 plate appearances and … well, it’s pretty safe to conclude it was a fluke considering he hit a combined .249 with a .298 on-base percentage and .330 slugging percentage in the previous five seasons.
He’s a useful enough spare part to have around, but he’s no longer a true utility infielder in that he hasn’t started multiple games at shortstop since 2007 and guys like Cairo are available cheaply every offseason. Re-signing him for 2011 is perfectly reasonable if the price is low enough, but committing to him for 2012 at age 38 is just weird.
- There was a fire at Camden Yards 0
- David Ortiz and Robinson Cano give their Super Bowl XLIX predictions 7
- Zack Greinke hasn’t made decision about opt-out 9
- Someone apparently got Jayson Werth’s autograph in jail 20
- Chris Davis opens up about his Adderall suspension: “It was a moment of weakness” 55
- MLB.com names Byron Buxton as baseball’s top prospect for second straight year 42
- Yasiel Puig says the Cardinals are the Dodgers’ “principal rivals,” not the Giants 106
- Jayson Werth to serve five days in jail for reckless driving 48
- Great Moments in Media Arrogance: Marshawn Lynch edition (173)
- Yasiel Puig says the Cardinals are the Dodgers’ “principal rivals,” not the Giants (106)
- Why “Deflategate” would never happen in baseball (96)
- The Yankees are going to try to get out of paying A-Rod his contract incentives (85)
- Rosenthal proposal: make relievers face more than one batter per appearance (74)