Dec 8, 2010, 4:49 PM EDT
I’m not sure why any team would feel the need to give a multi-year contract to a 36-year-old, career-long utility infielder with a lifetime OPS under .700, but the Reds did just that by inking Miguel Cairo to a two-year deal.
In fairness Cairo is coming off one of the best seasons of his career, hitting .290/.353/.410 for his highest OPS since 2004, but that came in just 266 plate appearances and … well, it’s pretty safe to conclude it was a fluke considering he hit a combined .249 with a .298 on-base percentage and .330 slugging percentage in the previous five seasons.
He’s a useful enough spare part to have around, but he’s no longer a true utility infielder in that he hasn’t started multiple games at shortstop since 2007 and guys like Cairo are available cheaply every offseason. Re-signing him for 2011 is perfectly reasonable if the price is low enough, but committing to him for 2012 at age 38 is just weird.
- MLBPA files grievance against Astros in regard to draft pick situation 16
- The eyes have it: Thomas’ greatness built on patience 11
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams 182
- Mariners re-acquire Kendrys Morales from Twins for Stephen Pryor 21
- A’s designate $10 million reliever Jim Johnson for assignment 34
- Everything you need to know about next week’s trade deadline 35
- Impending free agent Jon Lester won’t talk contract with the Red Sox until after the season 19
- Ten years ago today the Alex Rodriguez-Jason Varitek brawl changed the narrative of the Sox-Yankees rivalry 87
- Expert’s Corner: How to troll fans of all 30 teams (183)
- Verducci: baseball should think about an “illegal defense” rule to combat shifts (162)
- Yankees acquire Chase Headley from Padres (108)
- Who is the next Face of Baseball? (97)
- David Ortiz passes Carl Yastrzemski on the all-time home run list — is he a Hall of Famer? (92)