Skip to content

Must-Click Link: The Case Against Jack Morris

Dec 28, 2010, 12:40 PM EDT

Click Here large

We’ve seen a lot of tortured arguments in favor of Jack Morris’ Hall of Fame case.  I’d recap some of the best ones, but really, you had to be there.

Anyway, today comes what I think is the definitive case against Jack Morris.  It’s by Dan Szymborski over at ESPN (sorry; Insider only).  It’s not hysterical. It’s not polemical. It’s not disrespectful of Morris’ considerable accomplishments, nor does it approach the matter from the standpoint of “you gotta be an IDIOT to vote for Morris.”  It merely takes the arguments most have used in favor of Jack Morris and points out the problems with them. And there are a lot of them.

Morris didn’t prevent the opposition from scoring runs at anything much greater than an average clip.  He didn’t “pitch to the score” (or, if he tried to, he was not particularly successful at it).  Apart from one game in the 1991 World Series, he was nothing special as a playoff pitcher.  Despite his “best starter of the 80s” reputation, he was rarely thought of as special by Cy Young voters, who gave him the same number of Cy Young votes over his career as Mike Hampton and Dontrelle Willis.

None of which is to say that you can’t still vote for Jack Morris for the Hall of Fame if you’re so inclined.  You can.  You just need to find a reason that has not been discredited, as Szymborski discredits these arguments here. And which you apply to other starting pitchers who you consider on your ballot.

  1. bigtrav425 - Dec 28, 2010 at 12:51 PM

    Jack Morris was a solid pitcher and guy but No HoF’er…Hall of Fame are for the best of the best and that is not Jack Morris….At the same time you can say that Jim Rice and a few others were not the best of the best and i would agree but we do not need it watered down more then it is( speaking of the HoF obviously)

  2. Old Gator - Dec 28, 2010 at 12:57 PM

    I have my pet rattlesnake Friendo to feed so I haven’t got forty bucks to spend on becoming an “insider,” nor am I interested in smearing my precious credit card information any more thinly around cyberspace than it already is. So, anyone want to provide a typical liberal who doesn’t want to work a nutshell gratis ‘capsulation of what those reasons and incisive refutations are?

  3. Andrew - Dec 28, 2010 at 1:16 PM

    I’d recap some of the best ones, but really, you had to be there.


Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. C. Correa (2545)
  2. G. Stanton (2492)
  3. G. Springer (2474)
  4. H. Ramirez (2473)
  5. B. Crawford (2282)
  1. M. Teixeira (2274)
  2. J. Baez (2195)
  3. H. Pence (2194)
  4. J. Hamilton (2153)
  5. Y. Puig (2099)