Comments on: There was nothing improper about Scott Boras’ loan to Edward Salcedo

By: Old Gator

Old Gator — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:32:51 +0000

This vindication, which may have been a product of unrevealed decisions by unnamed evaluators, comes at a time when Jon Heyman is preoccupied with Bert Blyleven. Doesn’t that smell fishy to anyone?

By: Utley's Hair

Utley's Hair — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:15:53 +0000

So…Scott Boras…?

By: Jack Marshall

Jack Marshall — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:05:31 +0000

Just a quibble, not an argument: the fact that an action broke no rules doesn’t necessarily mean that it wasn’t unethical or wrong. Rules don’t and can’t cover every situation. Any professional who will do anything not specifically forbidden by a rule is a slimy professional.

By: Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward

Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:38:21 +0000

Where’s the “I told you so” column?

By: BC

BC — Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:47:10 +0000

How could he have violated an MLBPA Union rule when Salcedo is not a union member? (Yet, anyway).