<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rangers are interested in Jim Thome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: angrycorgi</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[angrycorgi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can remove a portion of your comment and make it perfect (and show the underlying issue):

&quot;Young, at 16 Mil a year...doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can remove a portion of your comment and make it perfect (and show the underlying issue):</p>
<p>&#8220;Young, at 16 Mil a year&#8230;doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukehart80</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103456</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukehart80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 04:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spud, I see your point, I just don&#039;t see Murphy as being good enough to worry too much about his playing time. Maybe he&#039;s a late bloomer, but he hasn&#039;t been worth a spot in the line-up as I see it. I could see Thome being worth an extra win or two, which may or may not be worth his cost (some people think he wants $8M, I think he&#039;ll accept less).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spud, I see your point, I just don&#8217;t see Murphy as being good enough to worry too much about his playing time. Maybe he&#8217;s a late bloomer, but he hasn&#8217;t been worth a spot in the line-up as I see it. I could see Thome being worth an extra win or two, which may or may not be worth his cost (some people think he wants $8M, I think he&#8217;ll accept less).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke you miss my point.  If you already have David Murphy and he will be struggling to get playing time, why sign Thome?  I wasn&#039;t implying a trade was advisable primarily because Thome is a free agent and a trade wouldn&#039;t be applicable but simply that I would prefer Murphy over Thome and there is no place for both of them in the Ranger lineup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke you miss my point.  If you already have David Murphy and he will be struggling to get playing time, why sign Thome?  I wasn&#8217;t implying a trade was advisable primarily because Thome is a free agent and a trade wouldn&#8217;t be applicable but simply that I would prefer Murphy over Thome and there is no place for both of them in the Ranger lineup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lukehart80</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lukehart80]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one is suggesting that the Rangers trade Murphy to get Thome. Murphy has  an OPS of almost .800 over the last three seasons, so you&#039;d hate to see Texas lose him. The Rangers would simply be signing Thome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is suggesting that the Rangers trade Murphy to get Thome. Murphy has  an OPS of almost .800 over the last three seasons, so you&#8217;d hate to see Texas lose him. The Rangers would simply be signing Thome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t trade David Murphy for Jim Thome straight  up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t trade David Murphy for Jim Thome straight  up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quintjs</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quintjs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 21:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[you have to factor that Thome is a better hitter than all 5 of those guys. 

Texas probably won&#039;t get that starting pitching, so might as well have lots of offense to make up for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have to factor that Thome is a better hitter than all 5 of those guys. </p>
<p>Texas probably won&#8217;t get that starting pitching, so might as well have lots of offense to make up for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spudchukar</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[spudchukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They already have Mitch Moreland, Julio Borbon, Chris Davis, David Murphy and Michael Young.  5 guys for 3 positions.  Hard to figure out the Thome acquisition unless they are planning to package some of those guys for some much needed starting pitching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They already have Mitch Moreland, Julio Borbon, Chris Davis, David Murphy and Michael Young.  5 guys for 3 positions.  Hard to figure out the Thome acquisition unless they are planning to package some of those guys for some much needed starting pitching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigharold</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/10/the-rangers-are-interested-in-jim-thome/comment-page-1/#comment-103381</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigharold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 20:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=34566#comment-103381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Young, at 16 Mil a year, adding Thome even at 5 mil doesn&#039;t make a lot of sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Young, at 16 Mil a year, adding Thome even at 5 mil doesn&#8217;t make a lot of sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
