Skip to content

UPDATE: Brad Penny agrees to a deal with the Tigers

Jan 11, 2011, 9:27 AM EDT

Brad Penny

UPDATE: Buster Olney reports that the deal is done. As Morosi reported, $3 million.  The incentives are richer than usual, however, amounting to another $3 million.

5:55 AM: Following up on last night’s reports from Brad Penny himself, Jon Paul Morosi says this morning that the Tigers and Brad Penny are on the verge of a one-year, $3 million deal. Morosi says there will be incentives too.  Worth noting that Morosi first connected Penny and the Tigers back in mid-December.

Seems like a good deal for Penny who, before an injury last season, had nine good starts. Remember: he started things off going was 3-0 with a 0.94 ERA last year. He says he’s getting in shape now, though, and if that makes a difference, he could be one of the better putative fifth starters around.

  1. kinggeorge96 - Jan 11, 2011 at 7:40 AM

    I assume this means, that by the time spring training rolls around, that he’ll be ‘in the best shape of his life?’

  2. phukyouk - Jan 11, 2011 at 9:36 AM

    there goes the AL Central. the others may as well not show up. i remember when the Sox signed him and Smoltz as “low risk high reward” and the EXACT opposite happened.

  3. Jonny 5 - Jan 11, 2011 at 9:56 AM

    I can’t explain it. But I’ve always had a soft spot for big chunky pitchers. Penny, Blanton, Moylan, Jenks. I always give them more slack than the guys that stay in shape. I don’t have a clue why that is either. While being relatively thin myself, I don’t understand my own bias in this case. I’ve heard people say Fat pitchers are just better.

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Angels' 2011 overhaul finally paying off?
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. R. Castillo (3230)
  2. G. Stanton (2543)
  3. A. Rizzo (2308)
  4. H. Ryu (2084)
  5. J. Hamilton (2004)
  1. N. Arenado (1969)
  2. M. Trout (1960)
  3. E. Gattis (1907)
  4. D. Ortiz (1813)
  5. A. Pujols (1762)