Jan 31, 2011, 8:48 AM EDT
One of these sorts of articles comes down the pike every six to eight months or so, and I usually link them:
Laws and ethics are not based on what is easy and what is hard to control. They are based on standards of justice and what is ethically right. The reason I believe doping should be allowed is that I see nothing unjust or wrong about professional athletes using chemical compounds and medical knowledge to improve their abilities and performance. Let me rephrase that: there is nothing wrong with taking steroids.
The reason I link them: I’ve yet to have a reader refute the central logic. At least not one who actually reads the article and meets the argument on its own terms rather than one who engages in the circular “steroids are bad because they’re banned and they’re banned because they’re bad” logic that the linked article criticizes.
If performance enhancing can be safely used under medical supervision — and that’s the big if, and where my knowledge on the subject is the most hazy — what’s the problem?
(thanks to Ron Rollins for the link)
- REPORT: The Astros to name A.J. Hinch their new manager today 15
- Twins fire manager Ron Gardenhire 33
- Pouliot’s 2014 American League awards picks 15
- Previewing the 2014 Playoffs 79
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 83
- Reds beat Pirates behind Johnny Cueto, hand National League Central title to St. Louis 20
- Video: Steven Souza Jr. makes sensational catch to secure Jordan Zimmermann’s no-no 24
- David Price dominates Twins as Tigers win AL Central 30
- Hunter Pence dropped a bunch of F-bombs in his postgame speech. Good. (116)
- Derek Jeter’s final game in Yankee Stadium could be cancelled because of rain (85)
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights (84)
- Previewing the 2014 Playoffs (79)
- Bud Selig says A-Rod will “have a clean slate” once his suspension is over (78)