Jan 31, 2011, 8:48 AM EDT
One of these sorts of articles comes down the pike every six to eight months or so, and I usually link them:
Laws and ethics are not based on what is easy and what is hard to control. They are based on standards of justice and what is ethically right. The reason I believe doping should be allowed is that I see nothing unjust or wrong about professional athletes using chemical compounds and medical knowledge to improve their abilities and performance. Let me rephrase that: there is nothing wrong with taking steroids.
The reason I link them: I’ve yet to have a reader refute the central logic. At least not one who actually reads the article and meets the argument on its own terms rather than one who engages in the circular “steroids are bad because they’re banned and they’re banned because they’re bad” logic that the linked article criticizes.
If performance enhancing can be safely used under medical supervision — and that’s the big if, and where my knowledge on the subject is the most hazy — what’s the problem?
(thanks to Ron Rollins for the link)
- Alex Rodriguez hits 659th career home run, now one shy of tying Willie Mays 15
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal 238
- Max Scherzer doubtful for next start due to thumb injury 3
- Protesters converge on Oriole Park at Camden Yards 141
- It sure sounds like Adam Wainwright suffered a torn Achilles tendon on Saturday night 40
- Settling the Score: Saturday’s results 33
- Report: Rangers will pay Josh Hamilton less than $7 million; deal includes opt-out after two years 98
- Suspensions announced for Thursday’s brawl between the White Sox and Royals 78
- Pitchers batting is dumb and the DH should be universal (250)
- The early leaders in MLB’s “Franchise Four” thing have been announced (166)
- The Royals and White Sox had a benches-clearing fracas, five players ejected (156)
- Protesters converge on Oriole Park at Camden Yards (149)
- Kelvin Herrera gets a five-game suspension; Yordano Ventura fined (133)