Comments on: MLK III is not really leading any investor group for the Mets

By: aaronmoreno

aaronmoreno — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:58:39 +0000

Check that, it would be awesome if Stephen King owned a team.

By: aaronmoreno

aaronmoreno — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:58:02 +0000

If his name was Steve I don’t think we’d care at all.

By: BC

BC — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:27:09 +0000

He kind of looks like the guy that was on the show with Erkel and played Sgt. Al Powell in ‘Die Hard’.

By: Detroit Michael

Detroit Michael — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:17:13 +0000

Can we please banish this guy’s photo from the blog? He looks like he had a dream but ate it for breakfast and would like to order another one ASAP.

By: BC

BC — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:51:44 +0000

This guy has a sketchy past at best. Basically a publicity hound living off the legacy of one of the great Americans of the past century. MLB should tell him to go soak his head. Maybe he can buy a team in Dubuque or Glens Falls or something.

By: Jonny 5

Jonny 5 — Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:32:29 +0000

This guy isn’t exactly who you want as the face of any investment group. Although many owners are living off daddy’s coat tails as MLK 3 has been. He isn’t a shining example of bringing people together over money matters. He can’t even get along with his own family when it comes to that topic. King must be turning in his grave as his children fight and claw at the carcass of his legacy, for money.