Feb 11, 2011, 10:42 AM EDT
Andy MacPhail thinks it was the first A-Rod deal. At least that’s what he told a law school seminar yesterday:
“Alex Rodriguez to Texas was the worst signing in the history of baseball in my view,” MacPhail said. “Why? Because he played as well as you can possibly ask the kid to play. He had great years. And the needle didn’t move at all. … The team didn’t improve. Attendance didn’t go up. But hey, they got the lead story on ESPN. Well, if that’s what motivates you, you’re going down the wrong path. You want to put 35,000 people in the ballpark, win the games. That’s what [fans] are there to see. That’s what the Orioles need — to win some games.”
I suppose there are any number of ways to define the “worst free agent signing in history,” but I have a hard time putting A-Rod’s first deal with the Rangers in that category. It wasn’t the right deal for that Texas Rangers team at that time — and it was certainly dumb inasmuch Tom Hicks was bidding against himself — but at least it involved a guy the Rangers were able to eventually unload when they realized their mistake.
Ask the Giants how they feel about Barry Zito or the Astros how they feel about Carlos Lee right now. Even at way lower dollars, I’m inclined to think that those deals (and several others) were bigger albatrosses than the $250 million that went to one of the two or three best players in baseball over what would have been the length of the original deal.