<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scott Boras rips Tony La Russa a new one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffrp</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-112083</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffrp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-112083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The union cares about the freedom of players to play where they want only as an ancillary benefit of free agency. The true goal is to drive salaries higher and that so far and away supersedes freedom of movement it&#039;s not even funny. A couple points to consider:
 - The union does not want universal free agency, indeed that would be their nightmare scenario with a flood of free agents creating too much supply in the market and depressing salaries. 
 - The union&#039;s greatest tactical advantage  is not free agency, rather it is salary arbitration which is of course not about where a player plays at all.

So is La Russa talking out of his rear end?  Of course he is. But remember it was the union that killed ARod to the Red Sox so as not to allow a precedent to be set that a player could devalue his contract.  ARod wanted to go to Boston, where was the union standing up for Alex playing where he wanted to play?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The union cares about the freedom of players to play where they want only as an ancillary benefit of free agency. The true goal is to drive salaries higher and that so far and away supersedes freedom of movement it&#8217;s not even funny. A couple points to consider:<br />
 &#8211; The union does not want universal free agency, indeed that would be their nightmare scenario with a flood of free agents creating too much supply in the market and depressing salaries.<br />
 &#8211; The union&#8217;s greatest tactical advantage  is not free agency, rather it is salary arbitration which is of course not about where a player plays at all.</p>
<p>So is La Russa talking out of his rear end?  Of course he is. But remember it was the union that killed ARod to the Red Sox so as not to allow a precedent to be set that a player could devalue his contract.  ARod wanted to go to Boston, where was the union standing up for Alex playing where he wanted to play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzman656</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fuzzman656]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No you aren&#039;t supposed to take sides.  You are supposed to laugh that the Cards clearly cannot afford Pujols.  XD]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you aren&#8217;t supposed to take sides.  You are supposed to laugh that the Cards clearly cannot afford Pujols.  XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzman656</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fuzzman656]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would you defend Tony LaRussa?  He&#039;s overpaid and over-rated.  If you can&#039;t see that he is a hypocrite, then you really are a BaseballIdiot.  Of course it&#039;s about more than money.  I&#039;m sure he wants to play for a winner.  That isn&#039;t the Cards!

He wants Pujols to play for him and knows the Cards don&#039;t have the scratch to resign him.  Maybe he should focus more on clever strategies, like batting the pitcher eighth.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you defend Tony LaRussa?  He&#8217;s overpaid and over-rated.  If you can&#8217;t see that he is a hypocrite, then you really are a BaseballIdiot.  Of course it&#8217;s about more than money.  I&#8217;m sure he wants to play for a winner.  That isn&#8217;t the Cards!</p>
<p>He wants Pujols to play for him and knows the Cards don&#8217;t have the scratch to resign him.  Maybe he should focus more on clever strategies, like batting the pitcher eighth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calcaterra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Calcaterra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[La Russa&#039;s comments yesterday:

The way it should be, La Russa contended, is that a player in Pujols&#039; position should &quot;look at all the factors. ... It shouldn&#039;t just be the most money.&quot;

&quot;I&#039;ve had a number of players over the years who took the [most] money,&quot; La Russa said, &quot;and they&#039;ve regretted it later.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Russa&#8217;s comments yesterday:</p>
<p>The way it should be, La Russa contended, is that a player in Pujols&#8217; position should &#8220;look at all the factors. &#8230; It shouldn&#8217;t just be the most money.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve had a number of players over the years who took the [most] money,&#8221; La Russa said, &#8220;and they&#8217;ve regretted it later.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baseball Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111929</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Baseball Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 06:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did LaRussa every say Pujols shouldn&#039;t get the biggest contract and the most money possible?

What he said was, the union shouldn&#039;t be pressuring Pujols to do something he doesn&#039;t want to do, and let him make his own decision. 


Sounds like pretty good advice to me. Maybe people should stop condemning LaRussa just because they don&#039;t like him, and actually look at the facts of what was said. LaRussa also never said Wiener was the one who did it. 

He said the union did. Is the union Wiener, or is it the collective of players?

Deal with the facts of the issue as they really are, not what you want them to be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did LaRussa every say Pujols shouldn&#8217;t get the biggest contract and the most money possible?</p>
<p>What he said was, the union shouldn&#8217;t be pressuring Pujols to do something he doesn&#8217;t want to do, and let him make his own decision. </p>
<p>Sounds like pretty good advice to me. Maybe people should stop condemning LaRussa just because they don&#8217;t like him, and actually look at the facts of what was said. LaRussa also never said Wiener was the one who did it. </p>
<p>He said the union did. Is the union Wiener, or is it the collective of players?</p>
<p>Deal with the facts of the issue as they really are, not what you want them to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metalhead65</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metalhead65]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[so are we suppose to take sides in this spat?I hate both men equaly so it will be tough to choose. on the one hand you have a guy who thinks he invented baseball with his every move a stroke of genius, and don&#039;t forget your pitchers are not allowed to come inside on cards hitters as that is headhunting,but it&#039;s just baseball if their pitchers do it. and boras is all that is wrong with the game. I am all for getting as much as you can but there comes a point where the owner should not be told this is how much you will paythe guy or it&#039;s collusion.you don&#039;t like what they offer then get a real job! just because they can pay you 300 million does not mean they should have to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so are we suppose to take sides in this spat?I hate both men equaly so it will be tough to choose. on the one hand you have a guy who thinks he invented baseball with his every move a stroke of genius, and don&#8217;t forget your pitchers are not allowed to come inside on cards hitters as that is headhunting,but it&#8217;s just baseball if their pitchers do it. and boras is all that is wrong with the game. I am all for getting as much as you can but there comes a point where the owner should not be told this is how much you will paythe guy or it&#8217;s collusion.you don&#8217;t like what they offer then get a real job! just because they can pay you 300 million does not mean they should have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzman656</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111921</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fuzzman656]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LaRussa&#039;s statements are hypocritical because Tony makes as much as the market will bear but doesn&#039;t seem to think Pujols should.  But LaRussa isn&#039;t a fool - He knows very well that Albert doesn&#039;t need the union to tell him how much he should make.  That&#039;s Boras&#039; job.  Tony is playing politics with the fans.

That said, does anyone believe that this giant man is going to continue to be at the top of his game in five years?  I think that the Cardinals are going to let him walk rather than be held hostage the way the Giants were by Barry Bonds.  I hate to see them lose such a great player (yeah right, I&#039;m a Cubs fan), but almost no team could afford to risk so much on one guy.  Eight or ten years is an absurd length for a professional sports contract.

Not to take anything away from Tony LaRussa (or Steve Young or anyone else with a law degree that doesn&#039;t practice) but he isn&#039;t a lawyer.  He&#039;s a professional baseball manager.  Having gone to law school does not make someone a lawyer.  Passing the bar and practicing law does.

And not all lawyers are dirtbags.  Just the ones you don&#039;t want to like.  Don&#039;t hate the player - &lt;em&gt;Hate the game.&lt;em&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LaRussa&#8217;s statements are hypocritical because Tony makes as much as the market will bear but doesn&#8217;t seem to think Pujols should.  But LaRussa isn&#8217;t a fool &#8211; He knows very well that Albert doesn&#8217;t need the union to tell him how much he should make.  That&#8217;s Boras&#8217; job.  Tony is playing politics with the fans.</p>
<p>That said, does anyone believe that this giant man is going to continue to be at the top of his game in five years?  I think that the Cardinals are going to let him walk rather than be held hostage the way the Giants were by Barry Bonds.  I hate to see them lose such a great player (yeah right, I&#8217;m a Cubs fan), but almost no team could afford to risk so much on one guy.  Eight or ten years is an absurd length for a professional sports contract.</p>
<p>Not to take anything away from Tony LaRussa (or Steve Young or anyone else with a law degree that doesn&#8217;t practice) but he isn&#8217;t a lawyer.  He&#8217;s a professional baseball manager.  Having gone to law school does not make someone a lawyer.  Passing the bar and practicing law does.</p>
<p>And not all lawyers are dirtbags.  Just the ones you don&#8217;t want to like.  Don&#8217;t hate the player &#8211; <em>Hate the game.</em><em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granted42</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[granted42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 01:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could be argued that Boras may not know what he&#039;s talking about here.  Of course he would never see the union strong arming any players to take more money, because no one hires Boras thinking they&#039;re going to give some kind of hometown or loyalty discount:  They hire him to squeeze as much blood out of ownership&#039;s turnips as he can, so he and the union are on the same page in that regard.  Yes, La Russa has motive to keep Pujols in St. Louis, but Boras and the union have motive to get him to take top dollar with no discounts at all.  Pujols will get the richest contract in the history of the game, and Boras and the union will reap many rewards using it as the new benchmark.

Bottom lime is that Weiner, La Russa, and Boras are all lawyers, and they&#039;ve been trained to lie.  I don&#039;t trust any of them.  (Good post Craig.  ;-) )]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be argued that Boras may not know what he&#8217;s talking about here.  Of course he would never see the union strong arming any players to take more money, because no one hires Boras thinking they&#8217;re going to give some kind of hometown or loyalty discount:  They hire him to squeeze as much blood out of ownership&#8217;s turnips as he can, so he and the union are on the same page in that regard.  Yes, La Russa has motive to keep Pujols in St. Louis, but Boras and the union have motive to get him to take top dollar with no discounts at all.  Pujols will get the richest contract in the history of the game, and Boras and the union will reap many rewards using it as the new benchmark.</p>
<p>Bottom lime is that Weiner, La Russa, and Boras are all lawyers, and they&#8217;ve been trained to lie.  I don&#8217;t trust any of them.  (Good post Craig.  <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth noting that Boras hardly needs any pressure from the union to chase down the highest dollar for his clients.  That said, I think he&#039;s right here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth noting that Boras hardly needs any pressure from the union to chase down the highest dollar for his clients.  That said, I think he&#8217;s right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottp9</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scottp9]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to know why you think what you think about Sabathia.  I&#039;ve never seen that and don&#039;t believe it.

Boras is right about this - the union is worried about players having the freedom to do what they want, not about whether a particular free agent (or prospective free agent) gets a particular contract.  They never get involved in free agent negotiations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to know why you think what you think about Sabathia.  I&#8217;ve never seen that and don&#8217;t believe it.</p>
<p>Boras is right about this &#8211; the union is worried about players having the freedom to do what they want, not about whether a particular free agent (or prospective free agent) gets a particular contract.  They never get involved in free agent negotiations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[La Russa is complaining that the Union is strong-arming Pujols to get more money (or the most money).  Do you really think La Russa wuld give up some of his fat salary to make room for the team&#039;s budget?  Hell no and neither should Pujols.  The team should make room for Pujols is what I&#039;m saying or pay the price of losing him.  Personally I hope to God he is a free agent b/c the next off season will be full of awesome rumors and stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>La Russa is complaining that the Union is strong-arming Pujols to get more money (or the most money).  Do you really think La Russa wuld give up some of his fat salary to make room for the team&#8217;s budget?  Hell no and neither should Pujols.  The team should make room for Pujols is what I&#8217;m saying or pay the price of losing him.  Personally I hope to God he is a free agent b/c the next off season will be full of awesome rumors and stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baseball Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Baseball Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please enlighten me on how LaRussa is a hypocrite?  Did the manager&#039;s union pressure him to sign the contract for the highest amount of money in order to help the other managers make a lot of money?

Somehow I missed that. That&#039;s they only way he could be a hypocrite in this particular situation.

I think too many people are confusing their dislike for LaRussa with what he said. It&#039;s two different things.

Whether anyone likes LaRussa or not, his comments should be taken for what he said, not what peoples personal opinion of him his.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please enlighten me on how LaRussa is a hypocrite?  Did the manager&#8217;s union pressure him to sign the contract for the highest amount of money in order to help the other managers make a lot of money?</p>
<p>Somehow I missed that. That&#8217;s they only way he could be a hypocrite in this particular situation.</p>
<p>I think too many people are confusing their dislike for LaRussa with what he said. It&#8217;s two different things.</p>
<p>Whether anyone likes LaRussa or not, his comments should be taken for what he said, not what peoples personal opinion of him his.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Jason "El Bravo" Heyward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe what you will, he&#039;s right on this one.  La Russa is a hypocrite who&#039;s sweating at the fact that he may have only one more season with the greatest player of our era.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe what you will, he&#8217;s right on this one.  La Russa is a hypocrite who&#8217;s sweating at the fact that he may have only one more season with the greatest player of our era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigtrav425</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigtrav425]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boras is a a-hole and a scumbag like most agents.I believe him as much as i would Belicheat from the Pats]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boras is a a-hole and a scumbag like most agents.I believe him as much as i would Belicheat from the Pats</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim's Neighbor</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim's Neighbor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can appreciate a man who abuses commas and then apologizes.  No need to thumb that on down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can appreciate a man who abuses commas and then apologizes.  No need to thumb that on down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Baseball Idiot</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111836</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Baseball Idiot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The union was accused of pressuring Sabathia to sign with the Yankees to get the biggest contract.

Now, taking for granted I&#039;m an idiot, wasn&#039;t the issue that the union was getting other players to talk to Sabathia, so as not be caught being the bag man?  

If that was true, then Wiener saying he hasn&#039;t spoken to Pujols or his agent doesn&#039;t really matter. The head of the union not actually doing it himself doesn&#039;t mean there might not be some truth to the story. They&#039;ve been accused before. Where there&#039;s smoke, there&#039;s fire. Sometimes.

If Wiener would come and say that no one in the union has spoken to Pujols, or no one at the behest of the union has spoken to them, then I would be willing to believe it. Until I hear that, I would have to think there might be some truth to it.

Also, what was Boras&#039; point about the representation thing?  Is LaRussa questioning Pujols&#039; right to have an agent, or to negotiate? I don&#039;t remember reading anything about that, and LaRussa&#039;s statment that Pujols was being pressured really has nothing to do with who he is represented by, or how.

Sounds like Boras twisting the statment to make it sound like what he wants it to. I never thought that could happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The union was accused of pressuring Sabathia to sign with the Yankees to get the biggest contract.</p>
<p>Now, taking for granted I&#8217;m an idiot, wasn&#8217;t the issue that the union was getting other players to talk to Sabathia, so as not be caught being the bag man?  </p>
<p>If that was true, then Wiener saying he hasn&#8217;t spoken to Pujols or his agent doesn&#8217;t really matter. The head of the union not actually doing it himself doesn&#8217;t mean there might not be some truth to the story. They&#8217;ve been accused before. Where there&#8217;s smoke, there&#8217;s fire. Sometimes.</p>
<p>If Wiener would come and say that no one in the union has spoken to Pujols, or no one at the behest of the union has spoken to them, then I would be willing to believe it. Until I hear that, I would have to think there might be some truth to it.</p>
<p>Also, what was Boras&#8217; point about the representation thing?  Is LaRussa questioning Pujols&#8217; right to have an agent, or to negotiate? I don&#8217;t remember reading anything about that, and LaRussa&#8217;s statment that Pujols was being pressured really has nothing to do with who he is represented by, or how.</p>
<p>Sounds like Boras twisting the statment to make it sound like what he wants it to. I never thought that could happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111825</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ummm, ignore that comma after well.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, ignore that comma after well&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex K</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/15/scott-boras-rips-tony-la-russa-a-new-one/comment-page-1/#comment-111824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex K]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=39633#comment-111824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Love the reference to The Office.  Well, done.  

In a totally unrelated note, are there ever going to be tags for the posts again?  Those were/are 100 times cooler than thumbs up/thumbs down for comments!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the reference to The Office.  Well, done.  </p>
<p>In a totally unrelated note, are there ever going to be tags for the posts again?  Those were/are 100 times cooler than thumbs up/thumbs down for comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
