Skip to content

Great Moments in litigation: Roger Clemens’ lawyer subpoenas stuff he knows he can’t get

Feb 18, 2011, 9:41 AM EDT

Rusty Hardin

I won’t make too much out of this because when I read a couple of weeks ago that Roger Clemens had subpoenaed Congress in order to get notes and reports and whatever he could find, I didn’t think anything of it.  But the Daily News makes a good point today:  you can’t subpoena stuff from Congress that isn’t already a public record due to the immunity provided by the Speech and Debate clause to the Constitution.

And even if lazy ex-lawyers like me didn’t think about it at the time, Clemens’ lawyer Rusty Hardin should have because he’s been down this road before:

This is not Hardin’s first attempt to subpoena documents from a congressional committee. Hardin represented the giant auditing firm Arthur Andersen in 2002 when the company was indicted on obstruction of justice charges for shredding Enron-related documents.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing on Andersen, which had signed off on Enron’s fraudulent finances for years. When Hardin tried to get documents from the Energy and Commerce Committee, as well as notes of an interview conducted with an Andersen employee who later became a cooperating witness for the Justice Department, he was denied. The committee refused to hand them over, and the federal judge presiding over the case refused to compel the panel to do so.

I suppose ineffective belt-and-suspenders subpoenas are harmless in and of themselves, but at some point I wonder if Clemens will ask himself how much money he’s willing to pay to avoid what will probably be three months in a minimum security federal camp. At the most.  I’m sure his legal bill is into the millions already and I’ve seen criminal lawyers budget a full 50% for the actual trial and aftermath.  At some point, you figure the vacation would do him some good, no?

  1. proudlycanadian - Feb 18, 2011 at 11:30 AM

    Rusty sure isn’t rusty when it comes to finding ways to increase his bill.

  2. apbaguy - Feb 18, 2011 at 11:49 AM

    Great Matt Taibbi article in Rolling Stone about how, after the meltdown, no Wall Street scum have gone to jail, or even been prosecuted for insider trading, disclosure violations, etc., while the Feds throw their full weight at Clemens. No wonder he seems bewildered by it all.

  3. chrisny3 - Feb 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM

    The irony in all this is that Waxman offered Clemens the opportunity to opt out of the live congressional hearings the night before. And in his shining arrogance, Clemens instead chose to proceed. Surely this has to be one of the dumbest lawyer-client duos in the entire history of criminal law.

    Kudos to the Daily News for continuing to be one of the leading papers in the nation in regards to covering PEDs and sports issues — including BALCO and steroids in baseball. Maybe that’s why some seemingly pro-steroids fan here doesn’t like “New York’s Picture Newspaper.”

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

Jackie Robinson Day is bittersweet
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. T. Wood (6551)
  2. J. Kubel (5830)
  3. I. Nova (4973)
  4. S. Kazmir (4630)
  5. K. Uehara (3844)
  1. M. Moore (3811)
  2. Z. Britton (3524)
  3. J. Johnson (3357)
  4. T. Walker (3147)
  5. J. Chavez (3088)