Skip to content

Springtime Storylines: Did the Athletics add enough offense?

Mar 25, 2011, 9:12 AM EDT

Oakland Athletics v Milwaukee Brewers Getty Images

Between now and Opening Day, HBT will take a look at each of the 30 teams, asking the key questions, the not-so-key questions, and generally breaking down their chances for the 2011 season. Next up: The San Jose A’s (pending committee review).

The Big Question: Did the Athletics add enough offense?

The A’s were 11th in the American League in runs scored last year. In comes Hideki Matsui, David DeJesus and Josh Willingham. Out go Jack Cust, Gabe Gross, and Rajai Davis.  This is improvement. How much of an overall improvement, however, depends on whether the solid-yet-not-spectacular returning starters hold their own and/or improve.

Daric Barton had a nice season last year and one presumes that entering his age-25 season he could build on that, even if some projections are pessimistic.  Mark Ellis was another relative bright spot last year but I’m more pessimistic about him, as his 2010 season was out of step from his previous handful of seasons.  Kevin Kouzmanoff and Kurt Suzuki each had pretty dreadful years at the plate. Neither will ever win a Silver Slugger Award, but each has a bit more than they exhibited in 2010, and even a bit of upward-trending noise will help.

All of which gets to the heart of things for Oakland: with the pitching staff (more about them below) no one requires offensive heroics from this bunch.  What they need to avoid are total sinkhole seasons from multiple players like they had last season.  Getting rid of Gross and returning Coco Crisp to the lineup eliminates a couple of sinkholes. Adding Willingham and DeJesus brings in some upside (and also some injury risk).  Everyone else needs to at least be competent. It’s not a tall order for a team that will frequently be playing in low scoring games.

So what else is going on?

  • Obviously the rotation is a team strength. Trevor Cahill  was fantastic last year. Brett Anderson was too, and if he’s healthy this year — a big honkin’ if given his recent elbow troubles — he could really be something special.  Gio Gonzalez has looked phenomenal this spring and some people around the A’s camp think that he’s going to explode in 2011. I’m not sure if they do irony in the 209, but the guy that threw the perfect game last year may be the weakest of the A’s top four pitchers. Young pitching can break your heart, but if the members of the rotation can avoid being mentioned in the same paragraph as Dr. James Andrews this year, there is every reason to think they’ll be the best bunch in the American League.
  • Besides the offense, a weak spot last season was the team’s bullpen, but Billy Beane addressed it this winter, adding Brian Fuentes and Grant Balfour to the mix. With Andrew Bailey, those three combine for an outstanding late inning troika.  The concern, of course, is health.  Bailey has already missed time this spring. Balfour and Fuentes aren’t young. But really, the bullpen has been significantly improved. Throw in Michael Wuertz, Craig Breslow and Joey Devine and the A’s are competing with the Yankees for the deepest bullpen in the league.
  • Helping both the starters and the pen is some pretty spiffy defense. Barton is one of the best defensive first basemen around and Ellis and Cliff Pennington are solid up the middle. Kouzmanoff isn’t what he once was with the glove, but he’s no slouch. The only bad thing about all of this is if the A’s win the West, we’re going to hear from every person who ever misunderstood “Moneyball” about how crazy it is that the Moneyball A’s won with pitching and defense. That is always a tedious conversation.
  • We’re coming upon the two-year anniversary of Bud Selig’s announcement of the formation of the committee to study whether the A’s should move to San Jose. So far the committee has yet to make a peep, but its existence — and the specter of the team moving south — has done much to dampen fan enthusiasm. Between that nonsense and the desecration of the Oakland Coliseum with those seats for Raiders game — which simultaneously blocked what used to be a nice view of the hills and prevented any Anaheim-style renovation of the place to make it a pleasant ballpark — I’m struggling to think of a fanbase that has been more abused than that of the A’s. It’s a shame given that the A’s should be pretty damn good this season.

So how are they going to do?

Quite well.  Indeed, while I’m still picking the Rangers — a pick about which I am less enthusiastic given yesterday’s announcement that Neftali Feliz is returning to the bullpen — I think Oakland will challenge Texas all year and it wouldn’t shock me at all if they took the division instead.  For them to do it, though, will take health, the continued progression of their young rotation and some relative upside years from a few otherwise limited hitters.  And one tends not to get rich betting on luck, health and young pitching.

Call them second place in the West, but second with a bullet. If things break right, playoffs.

  1. dan1111 - Mar 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM

    I’m a little more skeptical about the A’s than you are. Last year, they had the best pitching in the American League. Four young starters had breakout seasons. It seems like a perfect storm of pitching to me, unlikely to be repeated–even though each may have the potential to repeat or improve upon his numbers, what are the odds that ALL of them do?

    In spite of everything going right pitching-wise, they went 81-81. The changes to the offense seem incremental, not transformational. None of the new arrivals is a truly impact bat, and Cust, whom they are losing, was quite productive last year.

    I hope you are right; I would like to see Oakland succeed. However, I think they will be battling the Angels for 2nd place, if that.

  2. apbaguy - Mar 25, 2011 at 2:03 PM

    Skepticism is entirely called for in any prediction of not just the A’s, but the AL West. As I said yesterday, the conventional pre-season wisdom all begins with “If xyz stays healthy… then…”

    But that’s the problem. They won’t stay healthy. And a lot of A’s pre-season is based on taking the new offensive players and transposing last years numbers without downgrading for park effect and for age (in the case of Matsui).

    Bret Anderson’s forearm, Bailey’s forearm, Devine’s elbow, Braden’s foot, Crisp’s brittleness, Sweeney’s knees, Ellis’ shoulder, Matsui’s issues…it just goes on and on.

    So this year will be the battle of the team doctors, and whichever team is healthier will win, unless both the A’s and the Rangers have a lot of injuries, in which case the Angels will take it.

  3. firerosenthalthebastard - Apr 19, 2011 at 6:29 PM

    pitching will be fine… offense offense offense

Leave Comment

You must be logged in to leave a comment. Not a member? Register now!

Featured video

When home-field advantage isn't so
Top 10 MLB Player Searches
  1. T. Lincecum (3048)
  2. M. Bumgarner (2598)
  3. M. Morse (2405)
  4. J. Shields (2217)
  5. Y. Cespedes (2060)
  1. H. Pence (1481)
  2. T. Ishikawa (1418)
  3. L. Cain (1410)
  4. U. Jimenez (1390)
  5. B. Butler (1378)