<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The McCourts may settle soon. And then Frank would have to deal with Bud Selig</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monsieurbear</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-125087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[monsieurbear]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 19:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-125087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I imagine that Bud says that the Fox deal is fine so long as all of the money goes to the Dodgers and none to either of the McCourts, which is certainly a defensible position to take regarding a team up to the wazoo in debt. If none of the Fox money can be diverted to settle the divorce, the Dodgers will need to be sold to finance any settlement.

With respect to koufaxmitzvah, LA Dodgers fans can and were &quot;taken for a ride by out of towners who think they can be part of the Southern California culture&quot;. And they reveled it for five seasons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine that Bud says that the Fox deal is fine so long as all of the money goes to the Dodgers and none to either of the McCourts, which is certainly a defensible position to take regarding a team up to the wazoo in debt. If none of the Fox money can be diverted to settle the divorce, the Dodgers will need to be sold to finance any settlement.</p>
<p>With respect to koufaxmitzvah, LA Dodgers fans can and were &#8220;taken for a ride by out of towners who think they can be part of the Southern California culture&#8221;. And they reveled it for five seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utley's Hair</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Utley's Hair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, BC, that&#039;s extreme even for a Mutts fan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, BC, that&#8217;s extreme even for a Mutts fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin S.</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You want the McCourts?  Good god man, how much capacity for punishment do you have?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You want the McCourts?  Good god man, how much capacity for punishment do you have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hep3</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hep3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 14:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit between McCourt and Selig might get rid of baseball&#039;s bogus Antitrust Exemption that they have had since 1922 because the Supreme Court ruled Baseball is a sport, not a business.  

It also brings to mind the quote by the late Edward Bennett Williams:

&quot;What is dumber than the dumbest football owner?   The smartest baseball owner.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lawsuit between McCourt and Selig might get rid of baseball&#8217;s bogus Antitrust Exemption that they have had since 1922 because the Supreme Court ruled Baseball is a sport, not a business.  </p>
<p>It also brings to mind the quote by the late Edward Bennett Williams:</p>
<p>&#8220;What is dumber than the dumbest football owner?   The smartest baseball owner.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BC</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 13:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the Wilpons just trade the Mets for the Dodgers?   Is that allowed?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the Wilpons just trade the Mets for the Dodgers?   Is that allowed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koufaxmitzvah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koufaxmitzvah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Man, they are ugly people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, they are ugly people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koufaxmitzvah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/05/the-mccourts-may-settle-soon-and-then-frank-would-have-to-deal-with-bud-selig/comment-page-1/#comment-124900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[koufaxmitzvah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=49560#comment-124900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It seems to me that it could be more than wanting to squeeze McCourt out that would animate Selig to reject the deal. Rather, it could be that baseball would really, really like a marquee team in a major market to do what the Yankees, Sox and Mets have done and form its own cable network someday.&quot;

What&#039;s funny is that Bud Selig spearheaded the McCourt ownership because he wanted to control the spending of the large market teams. Hence, the Dodgers move from Shawn Green and Adrian Beltre at the corners to Hee Seop Choi and Jose &quot;I lost the ball in the chalk&quot; Valentin-- basically mere pennies on the dollar. 

The bad news is that McCourt actually had to borrow money from Fox to buy our team from Fox. The really bad news is that Frank and Jamie want to pass along their bounty to their children. 

But the really, really bad news is that this makes Bud Selig and the rest of MLB look like fools. Folks say that the LA fans are laid back and not into their sports. Wrong. LA fans don&#039;t like to be taken for rides by out of towners who think they can be part of the Southern California culture (yes, there is some). See, no NFL in LA. The reason isn&#039;t because the Raiders and Rams didn&#039;t draw. The reason is more because the NFL has wanted LA taxpayers to shell out cash for another billionaire to pocket off a new stadium, and City Council has said many times, &quot;No dice.&quot; 

Hopefully, Dodger fans will continue to not show up to the Ravine, and Bud can restlessly toss in that bed he made.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It seems to me that it could be more than wanting to squeeze McCourt out that would animate Selig to reject the deal. Rather, it could be that baseball would really, really like a marquee team in a major market to do what the Yankees, Sox and Mets have done and form its own cable network someday.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s funny is that Bud Selig spearheaded the McCourt ownership because he wanted to control the spending of the large market teams. Hence, the Dodgers move from Shawn Green and Adrian Beltre at the corners to Hee Seop Choi and Jose &#8220;I lost the ball in the chalk&#8221; Valentin&#8211; basically mere pennies on the dollar. </p>
<p>The bad news is that McCourt actually had to borrow money from Fox to buy our team from Fox. The really bad news is that Frank and Jamie want to pass along their bounty to their children. </p>
<p>But the really, really bad news is that this makes Bud Selig and the rest of MLB look like fools. Folks say that the LA fans are laid back and not into their sports. Wrong. LA fans don&#8217;t like to be taken for rides by out of towners who think they can be part of the Southern California culture (yes, there is some). See, no NFL in LA. The reason isn&#8217;t because the Raiders and Rams didn&#8217;t draw. The reason is more because the NFL has wanted LA taxpayers to shell out cash for another billionaire to pocket off a new stadium, and City Council has said many times, &#8220;No dice.&#8221; </p>
<p>Hopefully, Dodger fans will continue to not show up to the Ravine, and Bud can restlessly toss in that bed he made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
