Apr 13, 2011, 6:14 PM EDT
Still thinking about that verdict. And it still makes little sense to me. Seems like the jury just wanted to compromise on something, so compromise they did. Hey, I think we have the best legal system in the world, but I never said it was perfect.
And just to be clear to those of you who accuse me of being a Bonds apologist: I’d actually be happier right now if Bonds was convicted of the perjury charge of lying about the syringe along with the obstruction charge. That would at least be logical. Oh well. After all of these years we have a verdict that basically says “Bonds was kind of a difficult witness.” Because the legal system has never seen one of those before.
Here’s a deep thought: how many newspapers and websites who report this tonight and into tomorrow will use the following headline: “Government fails to prove its steroids charges against Barry Bonds.” I’m guessing not many. Though it would be an utter hoot.
- Giants rout Royals 11-4 in Game 4 to even up the World Series at 2-2 14
- Mike Trout, Giancarlo Stanton win the Hank Aaron Award 1
- World Series, Game 4: Royals vs. Giants lineups 1
- Report: Rays owner Stuart Sternberg has discussed moving the team to Montreal 62
- Dave Dombrowski on Miguel Cabrera: “It’s worse than what we ever would have anticipated” 33
- World Series Reset: Can the Giants even things up? 4
- Behind strong bullpen, Royals edge Giants 3-2 to take a 2-1 World Series lead 36
- Paul Konerko, Jimmy Rollins named co-winners of the Roberto Clemente Award 4
- Shocker! Joe Maddon to opt out of his contract and leave the Rays (143)
- Erroneous Narrative Alert: no, the Giants are not a “gritty,” anti-stats organization (122)
- Pedro Martinez has some opinions about who the new “face of baseball” is (112)
- PANTY RAID! Homeland Security agents confiscate unlicensed Kansas City Royals underwear (109)
- The World Series ratings are low. So what? (107)