<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And now another edition of &#8220;Pete Rose wasn&#8217;t as bad as steroids users&#8221; theater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflex</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-131321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 08:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-131321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you feel that harshly about steroids then Rose should be in your doghouse.  He was one of the original managers encouraging his players to roid up during the 80&#039;s.  Go read the links I posted above.

There is no way to rectify an anti-steroid view with a pro-Rose view.  Either you accept steroids and gambling as not a big deal and Rose as a HOFer, or you accept steroids or gambling as bad for the game and Rose is out.  Take your pick.  Since he was involved heavily with both, you can&#039;t pick one and compare it against the other and say it wasn&#039;t so bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you feel that harshly about steroids then Rose should be in your doghouse.  He was one of the original managers encouraging his players to roid up during the 80&#8242;s.  Go read the links I posted above.</p>
<p>There is no way to rectify an anti-steroid view with a pro-Rose view.  Either you accept steroids and gambling as not a big deal and Rose as a HOFer, or you accept steroids or gambling as bad for the game and Rose is out.  Take your pick.  Since he was involved heavily with both, you can&#8217;t pick one and compare it against the other and say it wasn&#8217;t so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sasquash20</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-131282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sasquash20]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 23:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-131282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He has more hits then anyone. Ban him from the game today, not from the HOF. Guy is one of the all time greats. Stop riding your high horses about him breaking a rule because its posted all over the place. He paid his price for it lets move on and put him in the hall. Besides is there any proof he ever bet against his team? I may be wrong but I think I read they could only prove he bet on his team. There is a big difference in my eyes.

Steriods and other PEDs full effect hasn&#039;t been felt yet. But they did hurt the game a lot. Because of the records and WS winning teams that had players who clearly used them, the game has no integrity left. Thats all the more reason to put Rose in the HOF. The history,( if nothing changes******) is forever ruined by PEDs. Baseball was a game that the history meant something, but records are just a joke now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He has more hits then anyone. Ban him from the game today, not from the HOF. Guy is one of the all time greats. Stop riding your high horses about him breaking a rule because its posted all over the place. He paid his price for it lets move on and put him in the hall. Besides is there any proof he ever bet against his team? I may be wrong but I think I read they could only prove he bet on his team. There is a big difference in my eyes.</p>
<p>Steriods and other PEDs full effect hasn&#8217;t been felt yet. But they did hurt the game a lot. Because of the records and WS winning teams that had players who clearly used them, the game has no integrity left. Thats all the more reason to put Rose in the HOF. The history,( if nothing changes******) is forever ruined by PEDs. Baseball was a game that the history meant something, but records are just a joke now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raysfan1</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raysfan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 things--
.
1) By the rules of the HoF, if one&#039;s banned from baseball, that person is also banned from the HoF.  While I agree that the HoF should ditch that rule, that&#039;s the way it is.  This is also my response to those who keep brining up that Rose was the Reds&#039; manager when he got caught and therefore should still be eligible based on his playing accomplishments.
.
2) Yes, the 1919 WS was 92 years ago.  The scandal also almost ruined MLB&#039;s reputation.  Reputation/perception = $$$ and that&#039;s what MLB cares about.  It also wasn&#039;t an isolated incident.  For example, a few years later Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker were on the verge of being banned as well after an allegation by Dutch Leonard.  He (Leonard) ultimately refused to testify (a la Greg Anderson in the Barry Bonds case), and Commissioner Landis let the matter drop when Speaker and Cobb (temporarily) both retired.  One also does not have to look very far to find other sports that have had problems with organized gambling to realize that the incident 92 years ago is very much relavent today and would pose a much bigger threat to the bottom line.  One can argue the relative morality of gambling vs PEDs all day, but the damage to the sport&#039;s bottom line from letting the vigilance against organized gambling  slip is the far more real risk in the eyes of the league offices &amp; why the one rule posted in every clubhouse is the one on betting on baseball &amp; its consequence--permanent banishment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 things&#8211;<br />
.<br />
1) By the rules of the HoF, if one&#8217;s banned from baseball, that person is also banned from the HoF.  While I agree that the HoF should ditch that rule, that&#8217;s the way it is.  This is also my response to those who keep brining up that Rose was the Reds&#8217; manager when he got caught and therefore should still be eligible based on his playing accomplishments.<br />
.<br />
2) Yes, the 1919 WS was 92 years ago.  The scandal also almost ruined MLB&#8217;s reputation.  Reputation/perception = $$$ and that&#8217;s what MLB cares about.  It also wasn&#8217;t an isolated incident.  For example, a few years later Ty Cobb and Tris Speaker were on the verge of being banned as well after an allegation by Dutch Leonard.  He (Leonard) ultimately refused to testify (a la Greg Anderson in the Barry Bonds case), and Commissioner Landis let the matter drop when Speaker and Cobb (temporarily) both retired.  One also does not have to look very far to find other sports that have had problems with organized gambling to realize that the incident 92 years ago is very much relavent today and would pose a much bigger threat to the bottom line.  One can argue the relative morality of gambling vs PEDs all day, but the damage to the sport&#8217;s bottom line from letting the vigilance against organized gambling  slip is the far more real risk in the eyes of the league offices &amp; why the one rule posted in every clubhouse is the one on betting on baseball &amp; its consequence&#8211;permanent banishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larry3656</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[larry3656]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 17:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Concerning CC&#039;s comment about the White Sox scandal... That was ONE World Series 92 years ago, for God&#039;s sake!  It was an anomaly.  Steroid and drug use, not to mention incidents of domestic violence, illegal arms use, etc., etc. have become the norm!   The idea that gambling has had a greater influence on the sport - ANY sport for that matter - than performance enhancing drugs is naive, at best and ludicrous at worst.  Come on, you Rose haters, get your heads out of the sand.  Pete Rose made a mistake - a horrible mistake, to be sure.  Should he be banned from the game?  No doubt.  Should he banned from the HOF?  No way!  His on-field accomplishments were unparalleled.  His playing had significantly more impact on the game of baseball than the sin he committed and his actions, though illegal, did not affect the OUTCOME of one single game.  He paid his debt to society!  Let go of it!  

Let&#039;s also remember one more thing.  Let&#039;s stop viewing the Baseball Hall of Fame as place where one must be beatified in order to enter.  Many of the players whose accomplishments are celebrated within those &quot;hallowed&quot; halls were much less than saints.  

The HOF celebrates ON THE FIELD accomplishments.  In  a society where men are paid $100 million + to play a game and we welcome back as a conquering hero someone who maimed, tortured and murdered innocent animals, let&#039;s not lose our sense of perspective.

As Dennis Miller says... That&#039;s just my opinion - I could be wrong.

By the way... I&#039;m a Dodger fan.  Can&#039;t stand the Reds!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concerning CC&#8217;s comment about the White Sox scandal&#8230; That was ONE World Series 92 years ago, for God&#8217;s sake!  It was an anomaly.  Steroid and drug use, not to mention incidents of domestic violence, illegal arms use, etc., etc. have become the norm!   The idea that gambling has had a greater influence on the sport &#8211; ANY sport for that matter &#8211; than performance enhancing drugs is naive, at best and ludicrous at worst.  Come on, you Rose haters, get your heads out of the sand.  Pete Rose made a mistake &#8211; a horrible mistake, to be sure.  Should he be banned from the game?  No doubt.  Should he banned from the HOF?  No way!  His on-field accomplishments were unparalleled.  His playing had significantly more impact on the game of baseball than the sin he committed and his actions, though illegal, did not affect the OUTCOME of one single game.  He paid his debt to society!  Let go of it!  </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s also remember one more thing.  Let&#8217;s stop viewing the Baseball Hall of Fame as place where one must be beatified in order to enter.  Many of the players whose accomplishments are celebrated within those &#8220;hallowed&#8221; halls were much less than saints.  </p>
<p>The HOF celebrates ON THE FIELD accomplishments.  In  a society where men are paid $100 million + to play a game and we welcome back as a conquering hero someone who maimed, tortured and murdered innocent animals, let&#8217;s not lose our sense of perspective.</p>
<p>As Dennis Miller says&#8230; That&#8217;s just my opinion &#8211; I could be wrong.</p>
<p>By the way&#8230; I&#8217;m a Dodger fan.  Can&#8217;t stand the Reds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflex</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 08:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may wish to read the links I posted.  Rose did actually encourage the spread of steroids in the sport.  He encouraged his young players to try them.  He sent them to a dealer for this purpose.  This is not something made up, its something he was actively a part of when the steroid culture was in its infancy.

Could they have been used before?  Sure.  I wouldn&#039;t be suprised if a few players had done them previous to the mid-80&#039;s.  However there is no evidence that they were widespread until that point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may wish to read the links I posted.  Rose did actually encourage the spread of steroids in the sport.  He encouraged his young players to try them.  He sent them to a dealer for this purpose.  This is not something made up, its something he was actively a part of when the steroid culture was in its infancy.</p>
<p>Could they have been used before?  Sure.  I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised if a few players had done them previous to the mid-80&#8242;s.  However there is no evidence that they were widespread until that point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raysfan1</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129413</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raysfan1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 04:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The thing about gambling by a player or manager on baseball is the perception of the games being fixed.  Even if Pete Rose only bet on his own team, unless he bet every game, and always bet the same amount, the possibility is there that motivation is tied to how much he bet, and thus creates at least the perception that the competition is not real.  
.
Ultimately, MLB is a business &amp; what&#039;s good/bad for it is tied directly to profitability and fan interest.  The 1919 Black Sox scandal was far worse than steroids because it almost destroyed MLB&#039;s financial viability right at the time of the post-WWI financial panic.  Gambling remains the most potent thing that could turn baseball into nothing but a niche sport that most Americans won&#039;t watch--because it could make Americans no longer believe the competition is real.
.
A lot of people do cherish records in baseball, and thus the perception that steroids taint the home run record is important too, but baseball is making even more money now than it was a decade ago, and never took any significant decline in the wake of the BALCO scandal.  Therefore, the 1919 Black Sox scandal was worse.
.
One thing that does not often get mentioned in these &quot;which is worst?&quot; debates is whether steroids or the 1994 strike is worse--or cocaine in the 1980&#039;s.  I despise steroids as I consider them dangerous drugs with horrific long-term side effects for the abuser.  However, I think for the health of MLB both the strike and the prevalence of cocaine in the 1980&#039;s were worse.  I&#039;d personally rate them from worst to &quot;least bad&quot; as 1919 Black Sox scandal/betting on baseball, 1994 strike, cocaine &quot;epidemic,&quot; then steroids.  Craig, you&#039;ve written on these topics before too, of course, but I&#039;d be interested in your take on relative evils of these in comparison.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about gambling by a player or manager on baseball is the perception of the games being fixed.  Even if Pete Rose only bet on his own team, unless he bet every game, and always bet the same amount, the possibility is there that motivation is tied to how much he bet, and thus creates at least the perception that the competition is not real.<br />
.<br />
Ultimately, MLB is a business &amp; what&#8217;s good/bad for it is tied directly to profitability and fan interest.  The 1919 Black Sox scandal was far worse than steroids because it almost destroyed MLB&#8217;s financial viability right at the time of the post-WWI financial panic.  Gambling remains the most potent thing that could turn baseball into nothing but a niche sport that most Americans won&#8217;t watch&#8211;because it could make Americans no longer believe the competition is real.<br />
.<br />
A lot of people do cherish records in baseball, and thus the perception that steroids taint the home run record is important too, but baseball is making even more money now than it was a decade ago, and never took any significant decline in the wake of the BALCO scandal.  Therefore, the 1919 Black Sox scandal was worse.<br />
.<br />
One thing that does not often get mentioned in these &#8220;which is worst?&#8221; debates is whether steroids or the 1994 strike is worse&#8211;or cocaine in the 1980&#8242;s.  I despise steroids as I consider them dangerous drugs with horrific long-term side effects for the abuser.  However, I think for the health of MLB both the strike and the prevalence of cocaine in the 1980&#8242;s were worse.  I&#8217;d personally rate them from worst to &#8220;least bad&#8221; as 1919 Black Sox scandal/betting on baseball, 1994 strike, cocaine &#8220;epidemic,&#8221; then steroids.  Craig, you&#8217;ve written on these topics before too, of course, but I&#8217;d be interested in your take on relative evils of these in comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimbo1949</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimbo1949]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2011 03:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2002 World Champion Giants?

Which drugs have you been taking?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2002 World Champion Giants?</p>
<p>Which drugs have you been taking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbehrendt</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lbehrendt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 21:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[drunken, like I said, I think you&#039;re making an interesting point. There is something else to chew over, which is as manager Rose might try TOO hard to win a game he&#039;d bet on. Y&#039;know, he&#039;d play his injured star before the injury had fully healed, or use an arm out of the starting rotation in long relief -- something that might help his team in the short run but hurt them in the long run. As a general rule, we&#039;d rather have people trying their hardest because that&#039;s their job and not because they have their house and car bet on the game. 

By the way, I remember reading that in the early days of baseball it was common and accepted for players to bet on their own teams.  No one thought this was a bad practice. I personally think this IS a bad practice, but I throw out this factoid FWIW.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drunken, like I said, I think you&#8217;re making an interesting point. There is something else to chew over, which is as manager Rose might try TOO hard to win a game he&#8217;d bet on. Y&#8217;know, he&#8217;d play his injured star before the injury had fully healed, or use an arm out of the starting rotation in long relief &#8212; something that might help his team in the short run but hurt them in the long run. As a general rule, we&#8217;d rather have people trying their hardest because that&#8217;s their job and not because they have their house and car bet on the game. </p>
<p>By the way, I remember reading that in the early days of baseball it was common and accepted for players to bet on their own teams.  No one thought this was a bad practice. I personally think this IS a bad practice, but I throw out this factoid FWIW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon94022</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simon94022]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s easier to fuss over steroids if we think of them as something &quot;A-Rod, Bonds and McGwire&quot; were doing.  The reality is that lots, maybe even most, players in the 1985-2005 era used PEDs at one point or another, and virtually ALL of them were aware of PED use by teammates -- and said nothing about it in public, and apparently little or nothing against it in private either.  

The most irritating part of this debate is when people contrast Bonds and others with the supposedly &quot;clean&quot; players -- when in fact we don&#039;t know of ANY player who was definitely clean.  When Bonds broke Aaron&#039;s HR record 4 years ago, there was a lot of chatter of from the people who obsess over steroids about how wonderful it would be when a Clean Player like A-Rod broke The Cheater&#039;s record.

Oops.

It looks like steroid use in that era was a bit like cheating on your taxes -- in Italy, where almost everyone does it, it is widely tolerated, and there is little or no enforcement of the laws on the books that prohibit it.  That does not make it right, but it makes it a lot less wrong than it would be in a different context, where the behavior is rare, clearly disapproved of by society, and subject to clear and severe penalties.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easier to fuss over steroids if we think of them as something &#8220;A-Rod, Bonds and McGwire&#8221; were doing.  The reality is that lots, maybe even most, players in the 1985-2005 era used PEDs at one point or another, and virtually ALL of them were aware of PED use by teammates &#8212; and said nothing about it in public, and apparently little or nothing against it in private either.  </p>
<p>The most irritating part of this debate is when people contrast Bonds and others with the supposedly &#8220;clean&#8221; players &#8212; when in fact we don&#8217;t know of ANY player who was definitely clean.  When Bonds broke Aaron&#8217;s HR record 4 years ago, there was a lot of chatter of from the people who obsess over steroids about how wonderful it would be when a Clean Player like A-Rod broke The Cheater&#8217;s record.</p>
<p>Oops.</p>
<p>It looks like steroid use in that era was a bit like cheating on your taxes &#8212; in Italy, where almost everyone does it, it is widely tolerated, and there is little or no enforcement of the laws on the books that prohibit it.  That does not make it right, but it makes it a lot less wrong than it would be in a different context, where the behavior is rare, clearly disapproved of by society, and subject to clear and severe penalties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigharold</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigharold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There has been several articles quoting Tom House of the Braves where he states that steroids were used in MLB in the 60s and 70s.  So they were around but not nearly as widespread during Rose&#039;s early career. If accurate, and that seems to be the case, Rose can&#039;t be blamed in any way for PED use in the last two decades.  Also, Bob Gibson&#039;s been quoted as saying had steroids been available he would have likely took them too.  So apparently Rose&#039;s statement about using them if he could have are not the outlandish.

If we insist on tar and feathering Rose lets stick to the things that he actually did, .. bet on baseball.  That&#039;s more than enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been several articles quoting Tom House of the Braves where he states that steroids were used in MLB in the 60s and 70s.  So they were around but not nearly as widespread during Rose&#8217;s early career. If accurate, and that seems to be the case, Rose can&#8217;t be blamed in any way for PED use in the last two decades.  Also, Bob Gibson&#8217;s been quoted as saying had steroids been available he would have likely took them too.  So apparently Rose&#8217;s statement about using them if he could have are not the outlandish.</p>
<p>If we insist on tar and feathering Rose lets stick to the things that he actually did, .. bet on baseball.  That&#8217;s more than enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drunkenhooliganism</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129316</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drunkenhooliganism]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[lbehrendt- my point is that it&#039;s become such a talking point that gamblers could blackmail a baseball player that no one thinks that any number of drug dealers, gay lovers, jilted mistresses and Ponzi Scheme conspirators could also blackmail a player and pressure him to throw a game or an owner into making his team the laughingstock of professional sports. 

Stopping people from mingling with the criminal element is a great idea.  But Pete Rose didn&#039;t throw a game and never put up less than a great effort.  In fact, he did less to harm the actual result of a game than Hanley Ramirez does every time Hanley loafs to first base or jogs after a bad throw.

And yes, he&#039;s still a scumbag]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lbehrendt- my point is that it&#8217;s become such a talking point that gamblers could blackmail a baseball player that no one thinks that any number of drug dealers, gay lovers, jilted mistresses and Ponzi Scheme conspirators could also blackmail a player and pressure him to throw a game or an owner into making his team the laughingstock of professional sports. </p>
<p>Stopping people from mingling with the criminal element is a great idea.  But Pete Rose didn&#8217;t throw a game and never put up less than a great effort.  In fact, he did less to harm the actual result of a game than Hanley Ramirez does every time Hanley loafs to first base or jogs after a bad throw.</p>
<p>And yes, he&#8217;s still a scumbag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[who is ignoring the hits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who is ignoring the hits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny 5</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny 5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steroids didn&#039;t ruin baseball, neither did gambling. It&#039;s still alive and well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steroids didn&#8217;t ruin baseball, neither did gambling. It&#8217;s still alive and well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflex</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=steroids&amp;num=2
http://www.posner.com/articles/peterose%20-%20the%20posner%20file.htm

Read those.  Rose was all over getting steroids into the game.  There are two people who I consider to be among the worst things to happen to the game in my lifetime.  One is Pete Rose.  The other is Tony LaRussa.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=steroids&#038;num=2" rel="nofollow">http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=steroids&#038;num=2</a><br />
<a href="http://www.posner.com/articles/peterose%20-%20the%20posner%20file.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.posner.com/articles/peterose%20-%20the%20posner%20file.htm</a></p>
<p>Read those.  Rose was all over getting steroids into the game.  There are two people who I consider to be among the worst things to happen to the game in my lifetime.  One is Pete Rose.  The other is Tony LaRussa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigharold</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigharold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not trying to say that steroids weren&#039;t illegal nor does MLB have to ban everything that is illegal.  My point is that whether we are talking about steroids or amphetamines, both of which are PEDs, MLB not only had a rather cavalier attitude about enforcing that stipulation about steroids and they in fact provided amphetamines to players at one time.  So, why would a player take seriously a rule that has no mechanism to test for or enforce compliance nor any specific consequence for it&#039;s violation?  More importantly, what MLB does with regard to to PEDs has no bearing the rule Pete Rose violated.  A rule which has a long history of being upheld and a clear consequence for violating.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not trying to say that steroids weren&#8217;t illegal nor does MLB have to ban everything that is illegal.  My point is that whether we are talking about steroids or amphetamines, both of which are PEDs, MLB not only had a rather cavalier attitude about enforcing that stipulation about steroids and they in fact provided amphetamines to players at one time.  So, why would a player take seriously a rule that has no mechanism to test for or enforce compliance nor any specific consequence for it&#8217;s violation?  More importantly, what MLB does with regard to to PEDs has no bearing the rule Pete Rose violated.  A rule which has a long history of being upheld and a clear consequence for violating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon94022</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simon94022]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[drunken, it&#039;s not a matter of drug dealers being more ethical than gamblers.  When you get in debt to gamblers and either can&#039;t or don&#039;t want to pay, there&#039;s a very easy way to solve the problem if you&#039;re a ballplayer or manager -- just help them fix the outcome of the next game.

Obviously gambling with mobsters isn&#039;t the worst crime a person can commit.  It isn&#039;t rape, murder or kidnapping (and neither is steroid use).  But gambling has the unique ability to create a perception that games are fixed, and therefore meaningless and not worth spending money on.  That&#039;s what makes No Gambling baseball&#039;s Prime Directive, and that&#039;s why Rose&#039;s crime was infinitely worse for baseball than anything the done by the hundreds of players who have used PEDs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drunken, it&#8217;s not a matter of drug dealers being more ethical than gamblers.  When you get in debt to gamblers and either can&#8217;t or don&#8217;t want to pay, there&#8217;s a very easy way to solve the problem if you&#8217;re a ballplayer or manager &#8212; just help them fix the outcome of the next game.</p>
<p>Obviously gambling with mobsters isn&#8217;t the worst crime a person can commit.  It isn&#8217;t rape, murder or kidnapping (and neither is steroid use).  But gambling has the unique ability to create a perception that games are fixed, and therefore meaningless and not worth spending money on.  That&#8217;s what makes No Gambling baseball&#8217;s Prime Directive, and that&#8217;s why Rose&#8217;s crime was infinitely worse for baseball than anything the done by the hundreds of players who have used PEDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgflolox</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgflolox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look, here&#039;s the thing; players were/are using PEDs to become better, and increase their - and by extension - their team&#039;s success. They are still competing at the highest level possible to succeed. The consequences of gambling compromises the integrity of the competition. The best quote I&#039;ve heard on the subject of game fixing (I think it was John Thorn who said it) was &quot;When the ball went through Buckner&#039;s legs in Game 6 of the &#039;86 World Series, I have no doubt that he didn&#039;t do it on purpose.&quot; That&#039;s what needs to be protected, the assurance that every player is doing everything they can to win.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, here&#8217;s the thing; players were/are using PEDs to become better, and increase their &#8211; and by extension &#8211; their team&#8217;s success. They are still competing at the highest level possible to succeed. The consequences of gambling compromises the integrity of the competition. The best quote I&#8217;ve heard on the subject of game fixing (I think it was John Thorn who said it) was &#8220;When the ball went through Buckner&#8217;s legs in Game 6 of the &#8217;86 World Series, I have no doubt that he didn&#8217;t do it on purpose.&#8221; That&#8217;s what needs to be protected, the assurance that every player is doing everything they can to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still trying to figure out how steroids ruined baseball.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still trying to figure out how steroids ruined baseball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129295</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2002 World Champion Giants totally benefited from Bonds&#039; steroid use]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2002 World Champion Giants totally benefited from Bonds&#8217; steroid use</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lpd1964</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lpd1964]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where&#039;s the evidence that Rose discovered steroids? He popularized steroids?? Again, where is the evidence of that?? I&#039;m not even a fan Pete&#039;s but simple math-All time hits leader = HOF. I&#039;m not electing a pope, Mike Schmidt says he belongs that&#039;s good enough for me. Finally, I think Rose has been punished enough. I&#039;m not saying let Rose back in baseball to manage, lets honor his on the field accomplishments, how did the gambling help him get the hits?? nobody has answered that question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the evidence that Rose discovered steroids? He popularized steroids?? Again, where is the evidence of that?? I&#8217;m not even a fan Pete&#8217;s but simple math-All time hits leader = HOF. I&#8217;m not electing a pope, Mike Schmidt says he belongs that&#8217;s good enough for me. Finally, I think Rose has been punished enough. I&#8217;m not saying let Rose back in baseball to manage, lets honor his on the field accomplishments, how did the gambling help him get the hits?? nobody has answered that question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clydeserra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clydeserra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[threw one world series we know about]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>threw one world series we know about</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny 5</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny 5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I totally agree, but I also feel that today the punishment is weak in comparison to the lifetime ban gambling brings. I&#039;d probably say it&#039;s fair if by your second offense you get the ban, since &quot;You know it&#039;s against the rules&quot; now. What do you think? I think people misunderstand and think I mean the past PED abusers should be punished by MLB, that&#039;s not where I&#039;m going.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, but I also feel that today the punishment is weak in comparison to the lifetime ban gambling brings. I&#8217;d probably say it&#8217;s fair if by your second offense you get the ban, since &#8220;You know it&#8217;s against the rules&#8221; now. What do you think? I think people misunderstand and think I mean the past PED abusers should be punished by MLB, that&#8217;s not where I&#8217;m going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny 5</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny 5]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Seems like everybody has a strong opinion on Pete&quot;

How could you not, right? Hit leader, One of the hardest players ever, a-hole on many fronts. People either love him, Hate him, or can&#039;t decide and stick with both, like myself. 

One thing for sure is the man asked for what he got.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Seems like everybody has a strong opinion on Pete&#8221;</p>
<p>How could you not, right? Hit leader, One of the hardest players ever, a-hole on many fronts. People either love him, Hate him, or can&#8217;t decide and stick with both, like myself. </p>
<p>One thing for sure is the man asked for what he got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reflex</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129284</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reflex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, but this stuff misses the point.  People can argue all day about whether or not gambling or steroids are worse for the sport.  Both are bad.  But the point here really is: Both are parts of Pete Rose&#039;s legacy.  Rose discovered steroids in the mid-80&#039;s, reputedly said that if he were a younger man he&#039;d have used them in a heartbeat, and introduced his young players to them on the Reds. SI covered this several years back in a very lengthy investigation into the roots of steroids in baseball.

So far as I am concerned, Rose is at ground zero of the steroid epidemic in the sport.  Even if you somehow can excuse his gambling(I can&#039;t), you can&#039;t get around the fact that he had a major role in popularizing steroid use in the game.  You pretty much have to forgive both of those offenses to build a case for Rose being allowed back in the sport in any capacity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but this stuff misses the point.  People can argue all day about whether or not gambling or steroids are worse for the sport.  Both are bad.  But the point here really is: Both are parts of Pete Rose&#8217;s legacy.  Rose discovered steroids in the mid-80&#8242;s, reputedly said that if he were a younger man he&#8217;d have used them in a heartbeat, and introduced his young players to them on the Reds. SI covered this several years back in a very lengthy investigation into the roots of steroids in baseball.</p>
<p>So far as I am concerned, Rose is at ground zero of the steroid epidemic in the sport.  Even if you somehow can excuse his gambling(I can&#8217;t), you can&#8217;t get around the fact that he had a major role in popularizing steroid use in the game.  You pretty much have to forgive both of those offenses to build a case for Rose being allowed back in the sport in any capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan in Katonah</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129281</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan in Katonah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rose deliberately violated the Prime Directive and shuold not be allowed in the HOF, even with a ticket.  Funny, about 15 years ago I saw him signing autographs in Vegas and joked with my friends that we should go up and ask him to sign it &quot;Sorry I bet on baseball.&quot;  Likely he would have taken a swing at me.  Now he will do it for $100 with a smile.

Rather than go to bat for this unabashed liar, how about we get Marvin Miller into the HOF before he passes.  That is the true shameful omission of our time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose deliberately violated the Prime Directive and shuold not be allowed in the HOF, even with a ticket.  Funny, about 15 years ago I saw him signing autographs in Vegas and joked with my friends that we should go up and ask him to sign it &#8220;Sorry I bet on baseball.&#8221;  Likely he would have taken a swing at me.  Now he will do it for $100 with a smile.</p>
<p>Rather than go to bat for this unabashed liar, how about we get Marvin Miller into the HOF before he passes.  That is the true shameful omission of our time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rose&#039;s offense is far, far worse, and less defensible, than any of the steroid cheats. He defied a cardinal rule knowing the consequences. Gambling nearly destroyed the sport, which has every reason to regard connection to gambling as a threat to MLB&#039;s existence. And he lied about it, for years and years. If there was a way to separate the player (clean, great, unique) from the man (corrupt, dishonest, selfish), I would love to see Pete in the Hall. But there isn&#039;t. &quot;Don&#039;t do the crime if you can&#039;t do the time..&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose&#8217;s offense is far, far worse, and less defensible, than any of the steroid cheats. He defied a cardinal rule knowing the consequences. Gambling nearly destroyed the sport, which has every reason to regard connection to gambling as a threat to MLB&#8217;s existence. And he lied about it, for years and years. If there was a way to separate the player (clean, great, unique) from the man (corrupt, dishonest, selfish), I would love to see Pete in the Hall. But there isn&#8217;t. &#8220;Don&#8217;t do the crime if you can&#8217;t do the time..&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Marshall</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Marshall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The steroids were illegal without a prescription before they were banned. Banning was appropriate, but baseball doesn&#039;t have to ban everything that&#039;s illegal---the laws still apply to baseball players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The steroids were illegal without a prescription before they were banned. Banning was appropriate, but baseball doesn&#8217;t have to ban everything that&#8217;s illegal&#8212;the laws still apply to baseball players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigharold</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigharold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well either way, .. this is a &quot;good&#039;n&quot;.  Seems like everybody has a strong opinion on Pete.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well either way, .. this is a &#8220;good&#8217;n&#8221;.  Seems like everybody has a strong opinion on Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigharold</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigharold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is no doubt that PED use effected home runs. Home runs no doubt effect wins and losses.&quot;

True but if the pitcher throwing the pitch is taking PEDs too that doe put things in a different light.  Or, what if there are three or four position players on the opposite team taking PEDs to match the three or four guys on your team then isn&#039;t it a wash?

I&#039;m not defending PEDs use but clearly it is nearly impossible to say with any certainty exactly how pervasive PEDs use was or still is so it&#039;s equally impossible to determine the real impact on the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is no doubt that PED use effected home runs. Home runs no doubt effect wins and losses.&#8221;</p>
<p>True but if the pitcher throwing the pitch is taking PEDs too that doe put things in a different light.  Or, what if there are three or four position players on the opposite team taking PEDs to match the three or four guys on your team then isn&#8217;t it a wash?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not defending PEDs use but clearly it is nearly impossible to say with any certainty exactly how pervasive PEDs use was or still is so it&#8217;s equally impossible to determine the real impact on the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Calcaterra</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/04/15/and-now-another-edition-of-pete-rose-wasnt-as-bad-as-steroids-users-theater/comment-page-1/#comment-129267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig Calcaterra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=51594#comment-129267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coincidence/luck of the draw. The linked article just got published today, I saw it and -- bammo -- here it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coincidence/luck of the draw. The linked article just got published today, I saw it and &#8212; bammo &#8212; here it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
