<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tigers, Braves discussing trade involving Derek Lowe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/</link>
	<description>Baseball. Baseball. And then a bit more baseball.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 22:14:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[70% of Braves Fan not alive or conscious enough to witness Maddux&#039; brilliance disagree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>70% of Braves Fan not alive or conscious enough to witness Maddux&#8217; brilliance disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164550</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 17:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly what I had happen. 

Looks like Craig or Drew or someone removed the test posting I made. 

BTW, I think we should just keep experimenting with what works and doesn&#039;t - as apparently a couple of people don&#039;t like including stats to support their arguments. I &lt;b&gt;LOVE&lt;/b&gt; those thumbs down!

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly what I had happen. </p>
<p>Looks like Craig or Drew or someone removed the test posting I made. </p>
<p>BTW, I think we should just keep experimenting with what works and doesn&#8217;t &#8211; as apparently a couple of people don&#8217;t like including stats to support their arguments. I <b>LOVE</b> those thumbs down!<br />
 <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, so (code) compresses spaces and (pre) does pretty much what is desired, but shortens the line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, so (code) compresses spaces and (pre) does pretty much what is desired, but shortens the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 09:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eh, Lets try it.
(code)&lt;code&gt;
Name              BA   OBP   SLG
Jose Bautista   .336  .470  .701
&lt;/code&gt;

(pre)&lt;pre&gt;
Name              BA   OBP   SLG
Jose Bautista   .336  .470  .701
&lt;/pre&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, Lets try it.<br />
(code)<code><br />
Name              BA   OBP   SLG<br />
Jose Bautista   .336  .470  .701<br />
</code></p>
<p>(pre)
<pre>
Name              BA   OBP   SLG
Jose Bautista   .336  .470  .701
</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164511</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jwbiii

Thanks for the suggestion. I hadn&#039;t even thought about that. I used the &#039;Sharing Toolbox&#039; that&#039;s built-in on baseball-reference.com to eliminate extraneous columns and rows. Then I took the edited table and exported to html , &#039;pre-formatted text&#039; and bbcode [code][/code]. So it ended up being the pre (up above) that worked best from that lot.

I&#039;m not going to crazy with posting tables, but it would be nice to know what works. For one we don&#039;t have a &#039;preview post&#039; function and two I think having some references in the comments can add to the discussion.

I&#039;ve seen a few people embed video, so I should have thought of the code block.

Thanks again!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jwbiii</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestion. I hadn&#8217;t even thought about that. I used the &#8216;Sharing Toolbox&#8217; that&#8217;s built-in on baseball-reference.com to eliminate extraneous columns and rows. Then I took the edited table and exported to html , &#8216;pre-formatted text&#8217; and bbcode . So it ended up being the pre (up above) that worked best from that lot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not going to crazy with posting tables, but it would be nice to know what works. For one we don&#8217;t have a &#8216;preview post&#8217; function and two I think having some references in the comments can add to the discussion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a few people embed video, so I should have thought of the code block.</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 08:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, it probably wouldn&#039;t work. It looks like blog software compresses multiple spaces. Maybe if you open a  (code) block before you paste the table in you may have some success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it probably wouldn&#8217;t work. It looks like blog software compresses multiple spaces. Maybe if you open a  (code) block before you paste the table in you may have some success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 07:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d go with the (code) tag around a preformatted table, bl.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go with the (code) tag around a preformatted table, bl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwbiii</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jwbiii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 07:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;pre&gt;How does the (pre) tag look?&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;code&gt;How does the (code) tag look?&lt;/code&gt;
How does the (tt) tag look?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre>How does the (pre) tag look?</pre>
<p><code>How does the (code) tag look?</code><br />
How does the (tt) tag look?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, sorry the gobbledy gook - &#039;pre-formatted text&#039; tables from baseball-reference.com WILL work in these forums.
 
The other options will not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, sorry the gobbledy gook &#8211; &#8216;pre-formatted text&#8217; tables from baseball-reference.com WILL work in these forums.</p>
<p>The other options will not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigleagues</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164501</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bigleagues]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Derek Lowe, at ages 38 and 39 combined, is due to make TWICE as much money as Greg Maddux did at ages 38 &amp; 39 (which was only in 2004 &amp; 2005) with the Cubs - the Braves elected to not extend him after picking up the 2003 option for $14.7 Mil. Overall, Maddux earned $38M from Age 36-39, while Lowe will have pulled in a cool $60M.

Strangely enough the much less accomplished Lowe signed a 4-year/ $60M deal with the Braves in 2009 at age 36.

Me thinks the Braves are overwhelmed with joy at the prospect of moving on from Lowe.

Check out what Maddux did from Age 36-39 versus what Lowe has done so far from 36-38:

MADDUX
-------------                                                                  
Year   Age Tm    W  L   ERA  GS   IP       H     BB  SO   WHIP  SO/BB  Salary
2002   36  ATL   16  6   2.62   34  199.1  194  45   118   1.199    2.62     $14.75M
2003   37  ATL   16 11  3.96   36  218.1  225  33   124   1.182    3.76     $  6.00M
2004   38  CHC  16 11  4.02  33  212.2   218  33   151  1.180    4.58     $  9.00M
2005   39  CHC  13 15  4.24  35  225.0   239  36   136  1.222    3.78     $  9.00M

LOWE
---------
Year   Age  Tm   W  L   ERA  GS   IP       H      BB  SO  WHIP  SO/BB  Salary
2009   36   ATL  15 10  4.67   34   194.2  232  63   111  1.515   1.76     $15M
2010   37   ATL  16 12  4.00   33   193.2  204  61   136  1.368   2.23     $15M
2011   38   ATL    5   7  4.30   20   113.0  115   41    81  1.381   1.98     $15M
2012   39   ???                                                                                        $15M

** Both tables are courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.

The Win totals are pretty close for the 1st and 2nd season, but really it&#039;s not even close who the better Pitcher is. Maddux accumulated a WAR of 10.3 over those 4 seasons. Lowe is currently at 2.6, with less than a season an a half to go until his age 39 season is complete.

All this is a just illustrates a good rule of thumb. It&#039;s better to take a chance on a 1st ballot Hall of Famer with a tremendous track record of durability and performance, than to pass on him and over-compensate a few years later by over-paying for a slightly above average Pitcher.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Derek Lowe, at ages 38 and 39 combined, is due to make TWICE as much money as Greg Maddux did at ages 38 &amp; 39 (which was only in 2004 &amp; 2005) with the Cubs &#8211; the Braves elected to not extend him after picking up the 2003 option for $14.7 Mil. Overall, Maddux earned $38M from Age 36-39, while Lowe will have pulled in a cool $60M.</p>
<p>Strangely enough the much less accomplished Lowe signed a 4-year/ $60M deal with the Braves in 2009 at age 36.</p>
<p>Me thinks the Braves are overwhelmed with joy at the prospect of moving on from Lowe.</p>
<p>Check out what Maddux did from Age 36-39 versus what Lowe has done so far from 36-38:</p>
<p>MADDUX<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Year   Age Tm    W  L   ERA  GS   IP       H     BB  SO   WHIP  SO/BB  Salary<br />
2002   36  ATL   16  6   2.62   34  199.1  194  45   118   1.199    2.62     $14.75M<br />
2003   37  ATL   16 11  3.96   36  218.1  225  33   124   1.182    3.76     $  6.00M<br />
2004   38  CHC  16 11  4.02  33  212.2   218  33   151  1.180    4.58     $  9.00M<br />
2005   39  CHC  13 15  4.24  35  225.0   239  36   136  1.222    3.78     $  9.00M</p>
<p>LOWE<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Year   Age  Tm   W  L   ERA  GS   IP       H      BB  SO  WHIP  SO/BB  Salary<br />
2009   36   ATL  15 10  4.67   34   194.2  232  63   111  1.515   1.76     $15M<br />
2010   37   ATL  16 12  4.00   33   193.2  204  61   136  1.368   2.23     $15M<br />
2011   38   ATL    5   7  4.30   20   113.0  115   41    81  1.381   1.98     $15M<br />
2012   39   ???                                                                                        $15M</p>
<p>** Both tables are courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com.</p>
<p>The Win totals are pretty close for the 1st and 2nd season, but really it&#8217;s not even close who the better Pitcher is. Maddux accumulated a WAR of 10.3 over those 4 seasons. Lowe is currently at 2.6, with less than a season an a half to go until his age 39 season is complete.</p>
<p>All this is a just illustrates a good rule of thumb. It&#8217;s better to take a chance on a 1st ballot Hall of Famer with a tremendous track record of durability and performance, than to pass on him and over-compensate a few years later by over-paying for a slightly above average Pitcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgifinley88</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgifinley88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 04:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah i should have included that it would be expected that atlanta would eat some salary. and yeah army it seems atlanta is WAY more interested in clearing the money than getting back good players, they just want that deal to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i should have included that it would be expected that atlanta would eat some salary. and yeah army it seems atlanta is WAY more interested in clearing the money than getting back good players, they just want that deal to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanherrington</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ryanherrington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would take that deal 100 times out of 100.

Heck, I&#039;d take, Boesch for Lowe straight up.  You can keep your prospects!

And I might even give you a mid level prospect if you&#039;ll take Lowe&#039;s salary too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take that deal 100 times out of 100.</p>
<p>Heck, I&#8217;d take, Boesch for Lowe straight up.  You can keep your prospects!</p>
<p>And I might even give you a mid level prospect if you&#8217;ll take Lowe&#8217;s salary too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmonkeyarmy</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drmonkeyarmy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only if the Braves eat the salary which they won&#039;t do. Honestly, I think they would virtually give him away if the Tigers take on the entirety of his salary.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only if the Braves eat the salary which they won&#8217;t do. Honestly, I think they would virtually give him away if the Tigers take on the entirety of his salary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgifinley88</title>
		<link>http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/07/16/tigers-braves-discussing-trade-involving-derek-lowe/comment-page-1/#comment-164490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgifinley88]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2011 01:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/?p=71807#comment-164490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brennan Boesch and a mid level prospect for Lowe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brennan Boesch and a mid level prospect for Lowe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
