Jul 29, 2011, 3:10 PM EDT
As we noted last week, Roger Clemens’ lawyers are going to try to argue that he can’t be re-tried because doing so would violate his constitutional right against the double jeopardy. He filed a motion to that effect today, arguing that the prosecutors — worried that they were losing — intentionally introduced impermissible evidence for the sole purpose of getting a mistrial, and as such, should not be allowed to try him again.
Sort of like when your brother hit “reset” on the old Atari 2600 just when you were about to beat his high score.
This is kind of hard to take, though, because the trial was only in its second day. And the first day was so mind-numbingly boring that if the prosecution really did completely bollocks up their case, no one else had really noticed it.
Nice try, and I suppose there’s a chance Clemens wins, but I kinda doubt it.
- And That Happened: Monday’s scores and highlights 0
- Report: Cubs calling up prospect infielder Addison Russell 7
- Jonathan Lucroy headed to disabled list with broken toe 8
- Reds manager Bryan Price goes on profanity-laden tirade against media 49
- And That Happened: Sunday’s scores and highlights 75
- Report: Marlins manager Mike Redmond is on the hot seat 41
- Five Royals ejected in Sunday’s series finale against the Athletics 88
- White Sox will promote Carlos Rodon on Monday 14
- The Commissioner’s Office thinks that the Angels could indeed go after Josh Hamilton under his contract (153)
- “We no longer need the terrorists. We’re now so good at terrorizing ourselves.” (143)
- Another argument in favor of making the DH universal (129)
- When it comes to Josh Hamilton, Arte Moreno is a craven opportunist, not a “smart businessman” (116)
- Joe Buck has a truly awful suggestion about how to improve MLB broadcasts (109)