Aug 1, 2011, 9:40 AM EDT
While it’s been pretty clear that Bud Selig has the backing of all of the other owners in the Frank McCourt fight, yesterday Athletics owner Lew Wolff became the first to publicly call on Frank McCourt to sell the Los Angeles Dodgers.
What set him off was Frank McCourt’s ridiculous statement in court filings in which he equated Bud Selig’s salary from Major League Baseball with his own looting of the Dodgers over the past several years. Wolff — correctly in my view — considered this an unwarranted personal attack on Selig, who happens to be Wolff’s college buddy. Worth noting is that Wolff has his own problems with Major League Baseball — that committee that has held up his move to San Jose for more than two years — yet he has declined to lash out at Selig or the league.
Sadly, shame and public pressure have so far seemed ineffective in spurring Frank McCourt into any action so Wolff’s call of him to sell will likely have no effect. But it’s so rare to hear one owner go after another in Major League Baseball, and that suggests the low esteem in which McCourt is currently regarded.
- Video: Watch Kris Bryant get his first major league hit and RBI 4
- Yordano Ventura ejected for hitting Brett Lawrie with a pitch 15
- Pete Rose joins FOX as a baseball analyst 18
- Settling the Score: Friday’s results 55
- Josh Hamilton’s teammates say he’s in great shape and ready to play 28
- Mike Trout hit his 100th career home run to become the youngest member of the 100 HR/100 SB club 26
- Make that two: Alex Rodriguez hits second homer of the night, giving him 658 for his career 48
- Alex Rodriguez hit his 657th career home run 49
- The Commissioner’s Office thinks that the Angels could indeed go after Josh Hamilton under his contract (153)
- “Why Ted Cruz is like the Atlanta Braves” (150)
- “We no longer need the terrorists. We’re now so good at terrorizing ourselves.” (143)
- Another argument in favor of making the DH universal (127)
- When it comes to Josh Hamilton, Arte Moreno is a craven opportunist, not a “smart businessman” (116)