Aug 1, 2011, 2:04 PM EDT
Most of us never read actual studies. Just abstracts. Mostly because we have short attention spans. But hey, that’s life. Oh, look! Something shiny!
Latest abstract of a study we won’t read: one in the American Journal of Sports Medicine that says that MLB injuries are on the rise.
The upshot: there are more injuries among Major League Baseball players “despite advances in conditioning methods and injury treatments.” The study used “the number of players on the disabled list over a seven-year period to gauge the elite athletes’ risk of getting hurt.”
Query: isn’t it possible that we just have better diagnosis and more cautious teams now and that (a) there are just as many guys getting hurt now as there used to be, but we find more of these injuries today than we used to; and (b) teams are way more likely to DL an expensive asset these days whereas, is years past, there was a greater push for guys to “play through it” and thus not be DL’d?
I imagine that if I read the whole study, these queries may be addressed, but who has time for that in bloggyland?
- Hank Aaron is getting vile racist hate mail in retaliation for pointing out that racism still exists (244)
- “They Don’t Know Henry” (167)
- The Red Sox are still steamed that a PED guy played against them in the playoffs last year (133)
- Doug Glanville’s story about being racially profiled at his own home (125)
- There is still a racial divide in baseball (112)