Aug 3, 2011, 12:48 PM EDT
Yesterday was the one-year anniversary of the knee injury that ended Carlos Santana‘s fantastic rookie season and by coincidence the Indians are playing a series against the Red Sox at Fenway Park, where the home plate collision took place.
Santana hasn’t rediscovered the same success he had prior to Ryan Kalish running him over, but the switch-hitting Indians catcher has still been plenty valuable as a sophomore.
Santana is hitting just .229, which is 31 points lower than his rookie mark, but that poor batting average comes with 15 homers, 19 doubles, and 68 walks in 102 games for a .771 OPS that ranks eighth among the 28 catchers with at least 200 plate appearances.
Cleveland has kept Santana in the lineup more often than other catchers by starting him 33 times at first base, but he’s done a decent job behind the plate with a 4.14 ERA and 22 percent throw-out rate.
Santana hasn’t turned into the immediate MVP candidate some people expected, but that’s tough enough for a young player without having to come back from a major injury and he still ranks 32nd among AL position players in Wins Above Replacement. He’s already very good and still on track to become great.
- 2015 Preview: Philadelphia Phillies 0
- 2015 Preview: Cincinnati Reds 38
- The average Major League Baseball salary this year will be more than $4 million — a record 22
- 2015 Preview: Tampa Bay Rays 18
- The Cubs assign Kris Bryant and Addison Russell to the minors, option Javier Baez as well 70
- 2015 Preview: Arizona Diamondbacks 8
- 2015 Preview: Toronto Blue Jays 69
- Mariners prospect Victor Sanchez has died 26
- Ex-Cardinals outfielder Curt Ford was assaulted in St. Louis and told to “go back to Ferguson” (122)
- David Ortiz: “Nobody in MLB history has been tested for PEDs more than me” (118)
- Rob Manfred says it would be hard to reinstate Pete Rose in a limited way (91)
- The MLBPA releases a statement on Kris Bryant, mentions possible litigation (90)
- Did David Ortiz admit to more than he realized with his Players’ Tribune editorial? (88)