Aug 18, 2011, 4:05 PM EDT
The Nationals were given permission to wear a variety of military-flavored caps in batting practice Tuesday, but MLB wouldn’t let them wear them in the game that night against the Reds. The Washington Post’s Dan Steinberg asked why:
So then I called an MLB spokesman to ask what happened, and he explained that the league prefers its clubs commemorate specific causes with uniform patches or batting-practice displays, rather than the actual game hats. There are, however, coordinated league-wide headwear events, such as the white hats with stars-and-stripes logos that are worn on Memorial Day and July 4, with proceeds from sales of those caps donated to the Welcome Back Veterans program.
“We reserve hats for national tributes, where every club is wearing them on the same day,” spokesman Pat Courtney told me. “But we’re happy to work with clubs on alternatives.”
I can see the league’s point here, but as a one-time thing, it would have been pretty cool seeing the Nationals honoring the Navy SEALs and the Army with headwear that would have been far more noticeable than any uniform patch. I have my doubts the display would have led to a serious downturn in Nationals merchandise sales.
- Wrigley Field — the most human park in baseball — turns 100-years-old 6
- And That Happened: Tuesday’s scores and highlights 55
- Albert Pujols becomes 26th member of 500 home run club 39
- MLB suspends Martin Maldonado, Carlos Gomez, Travis Snider, and Russell Martin for Easter brawl 48
- “Respect the Game?” Phooey. 105