Sep 30, 2011, 4:30 PM EST
Earlier this week we learned that Frank McCourt and the Dodgers, in their battle with Major League Baseball, wanted to take discovery of other teams like the Marlins and the Mets in order to establish that they were held to a different standard than the Dodgers were being held to. Today the judge ruled: sorry Frankie.
Bill Shaikin reports that the judge ruled that “[t]his hearing is a not a referendum on the Commissioner or other baseball teams …” and that he’s done listening to the parties offering “allegations and innuendo” and wants to put an end to what he called a “sideshow.”
He has set a hearing, beginning on October 31st, in which Bud Selig and Frank McCourt will testify in person and the judge will determine whether or not MLB has been jerking McCourt around, thereby weakening baseball’s claim that McCourt had violated its debt, capitalization and other rules. If it is found that baseball has treated McCourt fairly, it could be the beginning of the end of his reign as owner.
This has to be construed as a big win for baseball, as the financials and side deals to which other clubs are subject are something baseball does not want brought out into public.
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 111
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 41
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” 368
- Blue Jays sign Dayan Viciedo to a minor league deal 8
- Chris Sale will be sidelined for three weeks with foot fracture 11
- Aramis Ramirez says 2015 will be his last year 33
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (368)
- If addiction is an illness — and it is — Josh Hamilton shouldn’t be suspended (308)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (115)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (85)