Oct 24, 2011, 11:51 AM EST
Yuniesky Betancourt was horrible this season, batting .252 with a .271 on-base percentage and .381 slugging percentage to go along with his increasingly range-less defense at shortstop.
Alex Gonzalez was the only player in baseball to accumulate more plate appearances than Betancourt with a lower on-base percentage and only five players batted more often with a lower OPS.
Wins Above Replacement, which attempts to quantify a player’s all-around contributions offensively and defensively, pegged Betancourt as the fifth-worst regular in the entire National League.
Yet with the Brewers holding a $6 million option or $2 million buyout on Betancourt for next season general manager Doug Melvin told Tom Haudricourt of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: “I thought Yuni Betancourt was a better player than what the critics said.”
Those “critics” have followed Betancourt from Seattle to Kansas City to Milwaukee, and their opinion somehow ends up being the same at every stop. And my guess is when it comes time to decide on that $6 million option Melvin won’t be putting his money where his mouth is.
- Matt Harvey makes his return. And he was really impressive. 20
- Hector Olivera’s camp denies any damage to ulnar collateral ligament 3
- UPDATE: Hunter Pence out 6-8 weeks with fracture in left forearm 28
- MLBPA: leaks are from people “who want to see Josh Hamilton hurt personally and professionally” 36
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene 147
- Report: MLB panel split on rehab for Josh Hamilton; one-year suspension is in play 45
- Joc Pederson goes 2-for-2 in Cactus League debut 6
- Braves scratch Mike Minor from start with more shoulder problems 6
- Daniel Murphy on Billy Bean: “I do disagree with the fact that Billy is a homosexual” (380)
- Suspending Josh Hamilton for a year would be obscene (147)
- Curt Schilling lowers the boom on some men tweeting threats against his daughter (137)
- That facts of Josh Hamilton’s case should not be a matter of public record (94)
- Billy Bean responds to Daniel Murphy’s comments (90)